Dr Andrew Hill – How many people died because you helped deny them ivermectin?

Started by Bruce Caulley, March 06, 2022, 04:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bruce Caulley

Watch the vid and look at his bloke's body language.


QuoteA year ago, one man sold his soul.

People were dying, hospitals were overflowing, but even by January 2021 we already knew ivermectin could save three quarters of those who died. Randomized trials of 2,282 people showed that only 2% of people on ivermectin died, compared to nearly 10% of the hapless people who missed out, yet he picked the "missed out" path.

Everything pointed in the right direction. The result of the meta-study was highly significant (p=0.0002!), the risks were almost nothing, the outcome was extraordinary, the effect was dependent on the dose, and the blood markers of inflammation were also reduced, as we'd expect.  Yet the conclusion of the same paper was that we needed larger trials before the results could even be reviewed. And this single line that contradicted nearly everything in the paper, was quoted everywhere to say the evidence was "inconclusive".

This was from the same man who said Ivermectin was "the way forward" and that he would give ivermectin to his own brother. Then suddenly he flipped.


https://joannenova.com.au/2022/03/dr-andrew-hill-how-many-people-died-because/