Parler is Gone...

[gcode]

The Ascendant Left
https://www.theepochtimes.com/an-ascendant-left-silences-and-excludes-their-enemies_3653630.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink&st=K1dziwjv1clNS5mwZfDhUYlkKJU33wWS7SHRUn7ZYdVG30J_vLu_5KByU0Qz8P3WD0jlzskdNd5TbRwsT4hxkvGSjjkmOt0ciH8">//https://www.theepochtimes.com/an-ascendant-left-silences-and-excludes-their-enemies_3653630.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink&st=K1dziwjv1clNS5mwZfDhUYlkKJU33wWS7SHRUn7ZYdVG30J_vLu_5KByU0Qz8P3WD0jlzskdNd5TbRwsT4hxkvGSjjkmOt0ciH8

Commentary

The best show on television right now features a major city, the capital of an unsteady government, that is gradually being pulled apart by two competing political parties. The center can't hold; it's being steadily overwhelmed by a pair of rival Socialist groups who don't hesitate to take their conflicts into the streets as they sweep away their country's past and head into a glorious future.

Meanwhile, the citizens of this increasingly fractured metropolis take refuge in a variety of vices, including transvestitism, casual sex of all permutations, part-time prostitution, blackmail, drug addiction, financial speculation and, when necessary, murder—and these are just the cops trying their best to hold the Republic together. Meanwhile, outside the elegant halls of authority, armed gangs roam the streets, setting upon each other with abandon in the ultimate game of thrones.

Washington, D.C., in 2021? No, Berlin in the late 1920s.

"Babylon Berlin," now in its third season on Netflix, isn't only brilliant storytelling for grownups, but a cautionary tale for our times. The collapse of the Weimar Republic, which lasted from the chaotic aftermath of World War I to the triumph of National Socialism under Adolf Hitler in 1933, was a brief, "liberated" interregnum between two halves of the same continent-wide civil war among the grandsons of Queen Victoria, marked by a febrile, anything-goes artistic and social freedom that burned itself out in less than 15 years.

In the struggle for Socialist supremacy, it was Hitler's brownshirts who bested Stalin's red shirts. Instead of owning the means of production, as Marx and Lenin had advocated, the Nazis—like their counterparts in Mussolini's Italy—simply co-opted them.

As in China today, the mighty engines of capitalism were allowed to flourish within tight parameters, and everything was put to the service of the State. In short order, the German military machine was back in business, national pride restored, and the population was infused with a kind of pre-modern "wokeness," in which the leader was worshipped, dissent was regarded as treason, and ideological enemies weren't only to be monitored and crushed but liquidated.

Ascendant Left
It can't happen here, you say?

In the few short days following the collapse of President Donald Trump's attempts to bring evidence of electoral fraud to the attention of the state legislatures and the courts—not to mention the calamitous events of Jan. 6—the ascendant left has moved swiftly to capitalize on what has proved a stunning propaganda victory for them and neutralize their enemies on the right.

Forget the looting, burning, and general civil unrest at the hands of BLM and Antifa in cities across America last summer—for which next to no one has yet been punished, and which was widely cheered by both the mainstream media and Democrat politicians up to and including Vice President-elect Kamala Harris. That's all ancient history now, replaced by the "insurrection," the "armed riot" at the Capitol, the "worst attack on Washington" since the War of 1812, when the British burned the capital and the White House.

Of course, it was not. Unrecalled by the born-yesterday media, for example, is the 1954 attack by four Puerto Rican separatists on the House of Representatives, during which some 30 shots were fired and five congressmen were wounded; the terrorists were later pardoned by Jimmy Carter in 1979. Also forgotten: the bombings of the Capitol building and the Pentagon in the 1970s by the radical leftists of the Weather Underground, led by Barack Obama's buddy William Ayers.

Never mind. In less than a week, the Democrat/Media/Tech/Social Media complex has sprung into action, deplatforming their ideological enemies in a mighty blitzkrieg, starting with the president of the United States, who has been rendered a non-person in true Stalinist style. Twitter accounts belonging to political undesirables starting with Trump have suddenly been suspended without warning—including mine (@dkahanerules)—or explanation, in the name of "safety" from competing ideas.

Meanwhile, the upstart rival Parler has been summarily unhosted by big tech servers, in the hopes that it will wither and die. The Republican National Committee has found itself cut off from email fundraising regarding election fraud by an email marketing firm called Salesforce, while the Hallmark company is now asking Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) to return its campaign contributions, on the specious grounds that the two Republicans are somehow culpable for last week's disturbance by questioning the Electoral College votes.

The Marriott hotel chain has now suspended donations to the Republican senators who objected to certifying Biden's win on Jan. 6.

Civil Rights Act
Such burgeoning private-sector fascism is naturally cheered on by the left but also by "conservatives" whose devotion to Milton Friedmanesque capitalism has led them to defend censorship by observing that a), it's not a First Amendment violation because it's not the federal government that's doing it and, b) if you don't like it, start your own Twitter or Facebook.

This is nonsense. The big tech companies are no longer fledgling startups in Jeff Bezos's garage (Amazon) or Mark Zuckerberg's Harvard dorm room (Facebook). Instead, they have become public utilities and monopolies, buying up or driving out their competition in a way that would shame Standard Oil or AT&T. They have also become, in effect, indispensable public utilities, like electric companies, providing essentials but regulated by local, state, and federal governments for the common good.

In attempting to stifle Parler and other rivals so brazenly and ruthlessly, the big tech monopolies have also left themselves wide open to juicy restraint of trade lawsuits, as well as federal charges for violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 definition of public accommodations, which prohibits discrimination against any class of citizens in businesses that are open to the public.

Let's look at the law: Title II of the Civil Rights Act explicitly states, "All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, without discrimination on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin."

Such places were defined as hotels, restaurants, movie theaters, concert halls, sports arenas, stadiums, "or other places of entertainment" which "customarily presents films, performances, athletic teams, exhibitions, or other sources of entertainment which move in commerce."

Can you spell Facebook? Do you ever watch YouTube (owned by Google)? With so much commerce now being conducted online—both Twitter and Facebook are important selling spaces for many business—how do the tech giants not fall under these provisions? If the right to an abortion can be discerned in the penumbras and emanations of an occluded constitutional "right to privacy," can anyone seriously argue the tech companies aren't subject to the Civil Rights Act?

Similarly, restraint of trade, which derives from English common law and is embedded in the U.S. code, forbids monopolies, tortious interference with a rival's business, and price-fixing. Hello, Parler!

Power
And where are the conservative lawyers, who should have been fighting this battle for at least the past four years?

The problem now is that the incoming Biden administration has no intention of going after its digital brownshirts and manufacturing partners, any more than Hitler would have gone after Krupp or Thyssen while they were supplying the means to rearm Germany, or punishing reporters for the Völkischer Beobachter, the Nazi Party newspaper. Getting the media on their side was crucial to both the success of the National Socialist movement in Germany and in its erstwhile ally, the USSR, where Pravda and Izvestia provided all the news that was fit to print according to the party commissars.

Like the journeymen who quickly adopted the party line in Germany after 1933, the American media has plainly chosen sides. Dissenters from the new orthodoxy will not only be kicked off social media, they'll be branded as ideological lepers and denied further employment. Anyone so much as associated with or supportive of the Trump administration will henceforth be deemed an outcast, and headed for the re-education camps or worse.

"Let it be known to the business world: Hire any of Trump's fellow fabulists above, and Forbes will assume that everything your company or firm talks about is a lie," wrote that magazine's chief content officer, Randall Lane recently. "We're going to scrutinize, double-check, investigate with the same skepticism we'd approach a Trump tweet."

At a time when the Democrats are begging for a peaceful transition of power, this would seem an odd way to heal the country's divisions. But who's going to call them on it? A country that prides itself on the fiction that we're a nation of laws, not men, is finding out the hard way what repressive ideologues have known not only since Weimar and Berlin, but since Babylon itself: power is all that matters, and the laws will follow.

Who's going to stop them?

Michael Walsh is the editor of The-Pipeline.org and the author of "The Devil's Pleasure Palace" and "The Fiery Angel," both published by Encounter Books. His latest book, "Last Stands," a cultural study of military history from the Greeks to the Korean War, was recently published.

[gcode]

Suppose They Gave an Inauguration and Nobody Came

https://www.theepochtimes.com/suppose-they-gave-an-inauguration-and-nobody-came_3654031.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink&st=sFuXf-dfrB4d_cxXl02wbwQKxbtfswTRsfBRQp54g3nXX5wW5wwtRoywAJHNvPoFGRmJWQ9pEyqLq0qTxmRTB71r7-R-84kJNGg">//https://www.theepochtimes.com/suppose-they-gave-an-inauguration-and-nobody-came_3654031.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink&st=sFuXf-dfrB4d_cxXl02wbwQKxbtfswTRsfBRQp54g3nXX5wW5wwtRoywAJHNvPoFGRmJWQ9pEyqLq0qTxmRTB71r7-R-84kJNGg

Commentary

The increasingly fascistic American left is setting a trap for the rest of their fellow citizens—often termed "deplorables" but more appropriately dubbed "normals" by Kurt Schlichter—by warning we intend violence all over the country during Joe Biden's inauguration.

This is nonsense, of course, but any kind of demonstration can be declared violent by a complaisant media or, more ominously, manipulated in that direction by provocateurs, with the slightest incident magnified beyond recognition.

Part of their intent is clearly to undermine the Second Amendment, actually to disarm us.

Another part is to justify yet more censorship and "canceling," furthering their assault on the number one principle that makes America America, freedom of speech.

Do not fall for it. There is a much better way to protest the inauguration.

Don't show up!

When I say don't show up, I mean really don't show up.

Don't protest the inauguration in any way, not in Washington, not at your state house, nowhere. Ignore the whole thing.

Don't even watch the event on television or stream it on any of your devices.

Let Bret Baier blather away all by himself, with or without Martha McCallum. That means no Newsmax or OAN too.

And especially do not watch their "Virtual Inaugural Parade." Turn it into a ratings disaster.

I know you will be tempted, but don't do it. Not even a glimpse. Ignore, ignore, ignore.

You must have something better to do, like fix that leaky faucet in the guest bathroom once and for all or finally to install that second peg board in the garage that's still in its shrink wrap.

Put another way: Suppose they gave an inauguration and nobody came?

This is the proper way to protest this particular inauguration, a just response to an election with serious allegations of fraud that were never remotely investigated, not even for the paltry ten days proposed by a handful of senators as a last resort.

A presidential inauguration is a celebration of democracy. There is nothing to celebrate here.

The proper visual image of this inauguration should be a cluster of lonely Democrat politicians and their media friends surrounded by... nothing... emptiness.

Well, not entirely empty. Maybe significant phalanxes of police and National Guard watching over violent disturbances that obviously never happened, an image—fittingly—out of North Korea.

So what do we do now?

Take notes. Remember everything they are doing and everything they say.

Just today, speaking of violence, we learned the lead attorney for one of their most "sainted" outlets, PBS, wanted to throw Molotov cocktails at the White House and have our children taken away by the Department of Homeland Security, Chinese Communist Party-style, to re-education camps.

It's just more evidence so many in the left have already earned their MP degrees, as in Masters of Projection.

So, patience, grasshopper, this is not the time for demonstrations. That time will come. Give them a chance to hang themselves a little more, because, like the PBS attorney, they surely will.

They're only just getting started. Give them a month or two in power and watch what happens.

Now is the time for us to organize, to understand on whom we can rely and whom we can't. They're revealing themselves every day.

We are, after all, half the country—and likely to be more than half soon enough because our ideas are so much better and they are getting the opportunity to put their wretched ones into action.

There will be a time—not far away—for demonstrations. Big ones.

Roger L. Simon is an award-winning novelist, Oscar-nominated screenwriter, co-founder of PJMedia, and now, editor-at-large for The Epoch Times. His most recent books are "The GOAT" (fiction) and "I Know Best]

[Sharles]

Trumps lawyers showed up in Nevada with 40, 000 pages of evidence of dead voters, out of state voters
illegal alien voters, double voters, felon voters etc etc etc..
They had a PO box in Vegas with over 200 absentee voters living in it.
All of this was gleaned from public records.
The judge showed up with a prewritten denial.. The court hearing lasted 40 minutes.

I wish for the sake of our country they'd dump it on the internet for all to see like Snowden and Assange did because I don't know how we continue as a country when there's a chasm that exists between Left and Right like this.

[Shazam/TPP]

Trumps lawyers showed up in Nevada with 40, 000 pages of evidence of dead voters, out of state voters
illegal alien voters, double voters, felon voters etc etc etc..
They had a PO box in Vegas with over 200 absentee voters living in it.
All of this was gleaned from public records.
The judge showed up with a prewritten denial.. The court hearing lasted 40 minutes.

I wish for the sake of our country they'd dump it on the internet for all to see like Snowden and Assange did because I don't know how we continue as a country when there's a chasm that exists between Left and Right like this.

that's what should happen at this point and let the American people decide, but you know that will never happen. sad times

[Sharles]

that's what should happen at this point and let the American people decide, but you know that will never happen. sad times

I really don't understand your statement. Why CAN'T this be done? It seems like such a simple thing. Are you telling me there's not one single place on the internet that would host this information and get it all out there, when WikiLeaks and Snowden did what they did? At that point, I'd say put up or shut up. Put this information on the internet or stop whining about no one being willing to look at it...

[Here's Johnny!]

Trumps lawyers showed up in Nevada with 40, 000 pages of evidence of dead voters, out of state voters
illegal alien voters, double voters, felon voters etc etc etc..
They had a PO box in Vegas with over 200 absentee voters living in it.
All of this was gleaned from public records.
The judge showed up with a prewritten denial.. The court hearing lasted 40 minutes.

I wish for the sake of our country they'd dump it on the internet for all to see like Snowden and Assange did because I don't know how we continue as a country when there's a chasm that exists between Left and Right like this.

They tried to post these items and they were removed or banned. Try releasing this information on Twitter and see what happens.

[Sharles]

They tried to post these items and they were removed or banned. Try releasing this information on Twitter and see what happens.

It's rather stretching credulity when you guys claim that no one anywhere in this entire world will host this information on the internet. If there's real information, the world needs to see it. Again, put up or shut up...

[TylerBeer]

They put their "witnesses" up for show and look how that turned out.

[Here's Johnny!]

They tried to post these items and they were removed or banned. Try releasing this information on Twitter and see what happens.

It's rather stretching credulity when you guys claim that no one anywhere in this entire world will host this information on the internet. If there's real information, the world needs to see it. Again, put up or shut up...

There is a document that has all the fraud information in it...try finding it on the internet... censored.

[YoDoug]

Leading up to the election there were quite a few polls that asked about socialism, court packing, and other ideas being put forth by the Dems. They didn't poll well. I am starting to wonder if this great silencing of conservatives is more about being able to silence the opposition to the coming legislative and executive actions the Dems are planning than silencing objections to the election. Now that the Electoral college has been certified, most R's have accepted it, they don't like it, but they have accepted it. There is a difference between censoring opinions about election fraud and complete silencing of your opposition. When Joe/Kamala/Pelosi/Schumer try to enact far left legislation/actions how will the opposition be able to reach their constituents and more importantly openly and publicly debate the proposed policy.

[Smit]

If a person is honest and doesn't try to pass off lies, misleading info, or crazy conspiracy theories they'll be able to have a discussion pretty much anywhere.

It doesn't seem that difficult but it seems a chit ton of people can't do it. :OldForumHeadScratch:

[Bucky Cornstarch]

Leading up to the election there were quite a few polls that asked about socialism, court packing, and other ideas being put forth by the Dems. They didn't poll well. I am starting to wonder if this great silencing of conservatives is more about being able to silence the opposition to the coming legislative and executive actions the Dems are planning than silencing objections to the election. Now that the Electoral college has been certified, most R's have accepted it, they don't like it, but they have accepted it. There is a difference between censoring opinions about election fraud and complete silencing of your opposition. When Joe/Kamala/Pelosi/Schumer try to enact far left legislation/actions how will the opposition be able to reach their constituents and more importantly openly and publicly debate the proposed policy.

Really? The dems are putting forth socialism and court packing?  I'd love to hear where you are getting this misinformation. Thanks for providing yet another example that facts do matter, and that those on the right are very rarely equipped with facts.

[YoDoug]

[quote="Bucky Cornstarch" post_id=3260 time=1610564782 user_id=144]

Leading up to the election there were quite a few polls that asked about socialism, court packing, and other ideas being put forth by the Dems. They didn't poll well. I am starting to wonder if this great silencing of conservatives is more about being able to silence the opposition to the coming legislative and executive actions the Dems are planning than silencing objections to the election. Now that the Electoral college has been certified, most R's have accepted it, they don't like it, but they have accepted it. There is a difference between censoring opinions about election fraud and complete silencing of your opposition. When Joe/Kamala/Pelosi/Schumer try to enact far left legislation/actions how will the opposition be able to reach their constituents and more importantly openly and publicly debate the proposed policy.

Really? The dems are putting forth socialism and court packing?  I'd love to hear where you are getting this misinformation. Thanks for providing yet another example that facts do matter, and that those on the right are very rarely equipped with facts.
[/quote]

Reading comprehension is key. I said the ideas they are putting forth, when polled, don't poll well. There is plenty of tweets and video of Dems calling for those things. I didn't say they put forth any legislation yet. I'm not sure if you can't comprehend that or if you are just playing semantics with words to try to suppress the truth.

For reference here are few Dems calling for court packing.

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/us-elections-government/ny-supreme-court-aoc-20201027-ufsj6omy6nf5dh7autj7xawxwq-story.html">https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politi ... story.html">https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/us-elections-government/ny-supreme-court-aoc-20201027-ufsj6omy6nf5dh7autj7xawxwq-story.html

https://nypost.com/2020/09/21/top-democrats-threaten-to-pack-supreme-court-if-trump-fills-seat/">https://nypost.com/2020/09/21/top-democ ... ills-seat/">https://nypost.com/2020/09/21/top-democrats-threaten-to-pack-supreme-court-if-trump-fills-seat/

[ghuns]

[quote="Bucky Cornstarch" post_id=3260 time=1610564782 user_id=144]
...Really? The dems are putting forth socialism and court packing?  I'd love to hear where you are getting this misinformation. Thanks for providing yet another example that facts do matter, and that those on the right are very rarely equipped with facts.
[/quote]

On court packing...

Democratic Senator Ed Markey wrote on Twitter on Friday that if Republicans seat a new justice during an election year, after refusing to give former President Barack Obama's nominee Merrick Garland a hearing in 2016, "when Democrats control the Senate in the next Congress, we must abolish the filibuster and expand the Supreme Court."

The party's presidential nominee Joe Biden has opposed the idea in the past. "I'm not prepared to go on and try to pack the court, because we'll live to rue that day," he told the Iowa Starting Line in 2019. His running mate, Kamala Harris, however, told Politico last year that she was open to court packing.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-packing-explainer/explainer-democratic-court-packing-would-prompt-a-gloves-off-political-fight-idUSKCN26C19G">//https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-packing-explainer/explainer-democratic-court-packing-would-prompt-a-gloves-off-political-fight-idUSKCN26C19G

[Shazam/TPP]

some people are just trying to get their post count up