Hunter Guilty.

[Incogneeto]

Sounds like we got back one of your "redditors" Neuro.  

[Incogneeto]

And Just to catch you up Bucky.

"stoopid" "doombass" and "Tard"

are still permissible on this site.

Just be careful who you aim it at.

P.S. Be Nice to Vegans.

He'll kick your Ass.

[mowens]

I would suggest it's more of a rational irrational thing rather than a Democrat Republican thing.

That means that you think one party is more rational than the other. The truth is there is no rational in politics today, at least by most people's definition. The goal in politics today is to fuck over the other party, demonize those who disagree and accumulate power by any means necessary.

I hate to beat a dead horse, but we're fucked no matter which candidate wins, just in different ways.

[Del.]

You guy's just don't appreciate the man who restored the soul of America.

[Incogneeto]

You guy's just don't appreciate the man who restored the soul of America.

But NOT The Brain!!!

[neurosis]

You guy's just don't appreciate the man who restored the soul of America.

Bill Burr?

[mkd]

The question on the form 4470 is unconstitutional on it's face. Not sure how it would go if you just failed/ refused to answer it.

well, refusing the transfer, a constitutional right, based on being  forced to incriminate yourself, another constitutional problem... a real lawyer could articulate this better, as I only play one on the web.

[Incogneeto]

The question on the form 4470 is unconstitutional on it's face. Not sure how it would go if you just failed/ refused to answer it.

well, refusing the transfer, a constitutional right, based on being  forced to incriminate yourself, another constitutional problem... a real lawyer could articulate this better, as I only play one on the web.

Did you sleep at a Holiday Inn??

[CNCAppsJames]

If you don't answer, you don't get the firearm. 

These days, the OVERWHELMING majority of gun shop employees won't sell guns to sketchy dudes. Not only do they not want the ATF coming after them, but, they don't even want the legal ramifications if they sell to a sketchy dude and he does some stupid shit. Used to be if you had dough, you were good to go. Not so today.

[Jeff]

This thread has 2 dumbsmits competing for the dumbsmit lifetime award.

[Bucky Cornstarch]

Prove it! To date no one can show a legitimate audit of votes versus registrations that adds up. You can call people stupid all you want but you have no proof to back up a valid election.

I'm not calling anyone on this board stupid. Unless, of course, we have J6 rioters here.

That being said, you, like most stolen election proponents, don't seem to understand how burden of proof works. If election fraud was so prevalent, and really altered the results in 2020, it should be slam dunk easy to prove. So prove it. Links to speculative, misleading and incomplete "news" articles from journalistic powerhouses such as Brietbart or Gateway Pundit don't count. Movies such as 2000 Mules don't prove your point, either.

You know what does count? The dozens of court cases that have either been thrown out or ruled unfavorably against the election deniers. Once again, prove your case. In a court of law.

You know, like was done with Hunter Biden.

[Smit]

Corrupt DOJ covers just about everything. 

[Brad St]

https://apnews.com/article/wisconsin-ballot-fraud-trump-trial-c6b568d58e2ad7121566c3734ab5d851

does this count as election fraud...

[CNCAppsJames]

I'm not calling anyone on this board stupid. Unless, of course, we have J6 rioters here.

That being said, you, like most stolen election proponents, don't seem to understand how burden of proof works. If election fraud was so prevalent, and really altered the results in 2020, it should be slam dunk easy to prove. So prove it. Links to speculative, misleading and incomplete "news" articles from journalistic powerhouses such as Brietbart or Gateway Pundit don't count. Movies such as 2000 Mules don't prove your point, either.

You know what does count? The dozens of court cases that have either been thrown out or ruled unfavorably against the election deniers. Once again, prove your case. In a court of law.

You know, like was done with Hunter Biden.

What you and the rest of the fraud deniers always claim and point to are the cases not heard or the cases that were thrown out. 

Fair enough.  

What you also fail to point to are the reasons the majority of the cases and their disposition; standing.

 I'm not about to explain to you how standing works, but suffice it to say if you understood it, you would not be  proclaiming victory. You would be hanging your head in shame.

 

[Smit]

https://apnews.com/article/wisconsin-ballot-fraud-trump-trial-c6b568d58e2ad7121566c3734ab5d851

does this count as election fraud...

I don't think most of the guys here are gonna want to talk about this.