32 DAYS

[Bucky Cornstarch]

That's my worry. If he somehow wins enough votes to stay ahead of their cheat ops, the current admin and deep state will freak out. After all the lawfare cases against him they have to be scared of being on the other end of actual real investigations. They will assassinate him, start WW3, or whatever it takes to keep him out of office.

The other thought I had is they will cheat enough to win, but it will be pretty obvious. However to stop Trump from going to the courts for justice they will jail him on his previous charges to keep him contained. Maybe even Epstein him while he is in custody.

You seem really worried about "they" and "their" cheating in the upcoming election. I agree with you, this would be terrible, and unprecedented in a presidential election in the United States. Let's hope this doesn't happen in November. Even worse for the country would be a significant portion of the population believing, without evidence or proof, that the election system in the U.S. was somehow compromised. Could you imagine if this same group of misinformed dolts did something drastic, like raid the capitol in an attempt to subvert the ratification of votes?

THAT would be a real cause for concern. 

[YoDoug]

You seem really worried about "they" and "their" cheating in the upcoming election. I agree with you, this would be terrible, and unprecedented in a presidential election in the United States. Let's hope this doesn't happen in November. Even worse for the country would be a significant portion of the population believing, without evidence or proof, that the election system in the U.S. was somehow compromised. Could you imagine if this same group of misinformed dolts did something drastic, like raid the capitol in an attempt to subvert the ratification of votes?

THAT would be a real cause for concern. 

I notice that you were completely MIA in my thread discussing actual convicted proven voter fraud and discussing the flaws and holes in the system that allow fraud and also make it very hard to prove. You love to come in here with your "I'm smarter than you" attitude to claim no fraud, but when we have an intellectual discussion about our voting system you sure seem to STFU. Don't worry, we see right through your BS. Your not fooling anyone.

[Del.]

You seem really worried about "they" and "their" cheating in the upcoming election. I agree with you, this would be terrible, and unprecedented in a presidential election in the United States. Let's hope this doesn't happen in November. Even worse for the country would be a significant portion of the population believing, without evidence or proof, that the election system in the U.S. was somehow compromised. Could you imagine if this same group of misinformed dolts did something drastic, like raid the capitol in an attempt to subvert the ratification of votes?

THAT would be a real cause for concern. 

Yet you're not upset about the coup to replace the sitting president with someone who never received a vote from her party. That is reason for concern.

[Jim at Gentex]

You seem really worried about "they" and "their" cheating in the upcoming election. I agree with you, this would be terrible, and unprecedented in a presidential election in the United States.

Wait, we seem to disagree on the definition of 'unprecedented', because Hillary Clinton outright stated on many occasions that the 2016 election was 'stolen' from her, by 'they' or 'them', assuming she means the Republicans.

So what is unprecented, the CLAIM of the theft of an election, or PROOF of the theft of an election?
Because Hillary repeatedly made that claim without any evidence whatsoever, but the audience always broke out in wild applause every time she said it because 'they' 100% believed it was true.

Btw...since we are defining terms, 'they', meaning the Democrats, in fact control the counting of the ballots in every major city, to include all of the swing states, so IF there is theft of an election 'they' are the ones who have the motive, means, and opportunity to do so.

[mowens]

I will be glad when the election is finally over so we can get on with whatever clusterfuck happens next.

[Jeff]

Wait, we seem to disagree on the definition of 'unprecedented', because Hillary Clinton outright stated on many occasions that the 2016 election was 'stolen' from her, by 'they' or 'them', assuming she means the Republicans.

So what is unprecented, the CLAIM of the theft of an election, or PROOF of the theft of an election?
Because Hillary repeatedly made that claim without any evidence whatsoever, but the audience always broke out in wild applause every time she said it because 'they' 100% believed it was true.

Btw...since we are defining terms, 'they', meaning the Democrats, in fact control the counting of the ballots in every major city, to include all of the swing states, so IF there is theft of an election 'they' are the ones who have the motive, means, and opportunity to do so.

Schmucky Cornstarch thinks that no Dem has ever claimed the election was stolen or rigged.
When in fact, it's been predominantly the left that screams that when they lose.

[Jim at Gentex]

This video is still out there.



Many other videos have been scrubbed from the interwebz, then YouTube had to backrtack.
https://nypost.com/2022/09/29/youtube-restricts-video-of-dems-critics-saying-2016-election-was-hacked/

Anyway, we ALL KNOW Hillary gets away with claiming the election was stolen, and Trump gets impeached for questioning the results, because there is clearly a double-standard in the MSM. 

[YoDoug]

The real concern with people like Bucky is the blanket fraud denial even when inconsistencies are pointed out. If we can't discuss election security and integrity concerns, and even do full audits when election outcomes are beyond statistical probability, where that leads is not good. People espousing the attitudes like Bucky will lead this country to violence and a civil war.

[Jeff]

The real concern with people like Bucky is the blanket fraud denial even when inconsistencies are pointed out. If we can't discuss election security and integrity concerns, and even do full audits when election outcomes are beyond statistical probability, where that leads is not good. People espousing the attitudes like Bucky will lead this country to violence and a civil war.

Yeah but...
He's sick of this crap!

[Newbeeee™]

I agree with you, this would be terrible, and unprecedented in a presidential election in the United States.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha 

[RobertELee]

You Could you imagine if this same group of misinformed dolts did something drastic, like raid the capitol in an attempt to subvert the ratification of votes?

That sounds "deadly" 

[ghuns]

I said in 2016, 2020, and I'll say it again; if Trump is everything the Dems say he is, if he will do everything they say he will do, then ANY action to prevent him from taking office is not only acceptable, but morally justified.

[Jeff]

I said in 2016, 2020, and I'll say it again; if Trump is everything the Dems say he is, if he will do everything they say he will do, then ANY action to prevent him from taking office is not only acceptable, but morally justified.

There is no "if". We know those claims are all lies, fearmongering and projection.
Not only that, we have 2016-2020 as proof.

[Incogneeto]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-joy-is-over-as-election-nears-kamala-harris-tone-goes-dark/ar-AA1sRvZT?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=95675f95608e48fb899b5ab73d218e69&ei=32  

[Jeff]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-joy-is-over-as-election-nears-kamala-harris-tone-goes-dark/ar-AA1sRvZT?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=95675f95608e48fb899b5ab73d218e69&ei=32  

Ahh yes, the old "I'm a terrible candidate with no actual policies so I'll just run on trashing my opponent instead" strategy.

The parrots will be shouting this from the rooftops.
Brawk! Trumps a facist! Brawk!