Trump on JRE

[Smit]

I take their statement at face value FWIW, and I also agree with them 100%. 

Well of course you do and will.
 
Same as you don't like what Kelly says so you reject it at face value.

[gcode]

You're missing this weeks key democratic talking points of calling us "garbage"

That is their closing arguement.
It pretty much implies that they will do anything necessary to prevent Trump's victory
and anything necessary to prevent the ratification of a Trump victory.
We're looking at a Constitutional crisis should Trump win the election.

[Jim at Gentex]

Well of course you do and will.
 
Same as you don't like what Kelly says so you reject it at face value.

No, I just disagree with him.
Is that so hard to understand?

[Smit]

No, I just disagree with him.
Is that so hard to understand?

No, not at all!

[Bucky Cornstarch]

She's a RINO and you'd be hard pressed to find a single Trump supporter that likes her. Let alone trusts her.

Well, at least she's got that going for her.

[Bucky Cornstarch]

That is their closing arguement.
It pretty much implies that they will do anything necessary to prevent Trump's victory
and anything necessary to prevent the ratification of a Trump victory.
We're looking at a Constitutional crisis should Trump win the election.

I'm trying to remember the last time a group tried to prevent the ratification of an election, and who that group might have been.

So yeah, we should be worried if Trump wins. 

[YoDoug]

That is their closing arguement.
It pretty much implies that they will do anything necessary to prevent Trump's victory
and anything necessary to prevent the ratification of a Trump victory.
We're looking at a Constitutional crisis should Trump win the election.

The crooked NY judge delayed sentencing until after the election, but before congress ratifies the electors. The judge will put him in jail, then the Dems will claim they can't award electors to a convict in prison.

[Jim at Gentex]

The thing about the 200+ Generals and Admirals statement is that it comes from lower down the chain of command, which is significant IMO.

We all know the upper echilons of the military chain of command become more and more political the higher you go, so it's good to hear from, let's call them, 'middle management', who are much closer to the rank and file soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen who do the actual work.

Yes, General Kelly and others have their own opinions based on their own experience, and we can respectfully disagree, but the opinions lower down the food chain can sometimes speak louder than the top brass. 

[RobertELee]

***BREAKING*** Last week the dems tried keeping non-citizens on the voter rolls in Virginia, this week the Supreme Court upheld Virginias decision to purge the non-citizens. Hows that for constitutional?

[RobertELee]

The thing about the 200+ Generals and Admirals statement is that it comes from lower down the chain of command, which is significant IMO.

We all know the upper echilons of the military chain of command become more and more political the higher you go, so it's good to hear from, let's call them, 'middle management', who are much closer to the rank and file soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen who do the actual work.

Yes, General Kelly and others have their own opinions based on their own experience, and we can respectfully disagree, but the opinions lower down the food chain can sometimes speak louder than the top brass. 

Yup, how you treat and work with the pee-ons is more of a testament to your character than how you work with the execs. The executives got there by climbing over and backstabbing all of the pee-ons.

[Del.]

Well of course you do and will.
 
Same as you don't like what Kelly says so you reject it at face value.

Why didn't Kelly come forward back when he was Chief of Staff with his opinion?

4 years seems a long time to withhold information if he thought Trump was a facist as he was serving under him.

[Jeff]

Why didn't Kelly come forward back when he was Chief of Staff with his opinion?

4 years seems a long time to withhold information if he thought Trump was a facist as he was serving under him.

Because his offshore account recently received a large "donation".  ~probably

[Jeff]

***BREAKING*** Last week the dems tried keeping non-citizens on the voter rolls in Virginia, this week the Supreme Court upheld Virginias decision to purge the non-citizens. Hows that for constitutional?

And Gavin Newscum making a law that makes it illegal for voting areas to ask for voter id.

Like Joe Rogan said, he tried to look at any plausible reason for not wanting voter id. And the only reason is to cheat. Period.
Those that suffer from TDS give me a reason without using the race card or saying that those in minority communities have a hard time getting an ID because we all know that's bullshit.
The S.O.S is widely available in all counties across the country.

[RobertELee]

And Gavin Newscum making a law that makes it illegal for voting areas to ask for voter id.

Like Joe Rogan said, he tried to look at any plausible reason for not wanting voter id. And the only reason is to cheat. Period.
Those that suffer from TDS give me a reason without using the race card or saying that those in minority communities have a hard time getting an ID because we all know that's bullshit.
The S.O.S is widely available in all counties across the country.

That's rAyCiSt!!!!!!! Didn't you know black and brown people can't get IDs or use a computer?

[Smit]

Why didn't Kelly come forward back when he was Chief of Staff with his opinion?

4 years seems a long time to withhold information if he thought Trump was a facist as he was serving under him.

Kelly was chief of staff and in a position to possibly advise Trump. The acting chief of staff, especially an officer, will not publicly criticize the President.

A person with military experience will know that is true.