Sec. of Defense

[Newbeeee™]

I mean, you literally posted a link to a guy who is completely anonymous, who cites back to his own information as proof that what he's saying is true including his own charts. You're willing to believe someone like that, but shit all over anyone who might not give the information that feeds your confirmation bias?   

I get your skepticism when it comes to government funded studies, but you don't have a leg to stand on when you want to tell someone what they sound like.  Or at least maybe try a less arrogant approach?

Nah, I don't believe a thing anymore and I don't mean to tell anyone anything. It's for each of us to dig and believe what we want to believe and I certainly don't mean to sound arrogant, and I certainly don't have an approach

[Del.]

No, because I didn't have to argue with 10 people about whether he was guilty or not. Unlike Gaetz.

Have you noticed a pattern. You seem to challenge every post someone else makes.

[Smit]

Yeah leave all those guys alone. Go find your own echo chamber! 

[neurosis]

and I certainly don't have an approach

I must have been confused by the two pages of laughter.  

[Newbeeee™]

I must have been confused by the two pages of laughter.  

Yes, that's because I was laughing. That's not an approach, that's just laughing.
But I trust a gas station sushi and rotdog combo, over anything pushed by Gov.

[neurosis]

Have you noticed a pattern. You seem to challenge every post someone else makes.

Only the posts that I think are worthy of a discussion that I have varying degrees of disagreement.

Have you noticed that most of my posts are consistently challenged? Sometimes, even when I am agreeing (Incog!)

Have you ever hung out on a forum that has an equal number of people with opposing viewpoints?

[neurosis]

But I trust a gas station sushi and rotdog combo, over anything pushed by Gov.

I'm not faulting you for that.   

[Incogneeto]

I have varying degrees of disagreement.

"Be Specific"!!

[Jeff]

most of my posts are consistently challenged?

nuh uh

[Incogneeto]

nuh uh

R Not!! R Not!!

Not Me!!

[neurosis]

    

WASHINGTON -- The House Ethics Committee obtained records, including a check and records of Venmo payments, that appear to show that then-Rep. Matt Gaetz paid more than $10,000 to two women who were later witnesses in sexual misconduct probes conducted by both the House and the Justice Department, according to documents obtained by ABC News.

[Jeff]

sexual misconduct

So he might be guilty of hiring 2 hookers?

[neurosis]

So he might be guilty of hiring 2 hookers?

And sleeping with one while she was under age (allegedly). And the drugs thing. 

But yea, it's looking like he definitely hired two hookers.   

[Del.]

I wouldn't have picked him. He's not even a Fox News host.

[mowens]

And sleeping with one while she was under age (allegedly). And the drugs thing. 

But yea, it's looking like he definitely hired two hookers. 

Maybe he needed his house painted.