Trump needs to sign an EO to release the Epstein list!

[MIL-TFP-41]

My prediction....Bondi will suddenly find new evidence and launch an investigation. Any materials that are under investigation will be exempt from being released. New witness comes forward, new victim speaks up, there are a million things that could qualify as new evidence. The wheels for this were in motion with Trump calling for Clinton to be investigated further.

Rinse, repeat, this will go on till all the old molesters are dead. Nothing, and I mean nothing, new will be released. Well maybe the OpenAI guy is taking one for the team.

[neurosis]

My prediction....Bondi will suddenly find new evidence and launch an investigation.

Didn't they already start an investigation into several Democrats?

"Attorney General Pam Bondi has initiated an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's ties with prominent Democrats, following a directive from President Donald Trump.
 On November 14, 2025, Trump announced on Truth Social that he was asking Bondi and the Department of Justice (DOJ), along with the FBI, to investigate Epstein's connections to several high-profile Democrats and institutions."

They've already paved the road.   

[CNCAppsJames]

The Clinton body count is about to rise. 

 

 

[Rstewart]

Epstein Files Released --probably looks like:

Redacted | Redacted | Epstein | Redacted | Redacted

[CNCAppsJames]

Epstein Files Released --probably looks like:

Redacted | Redacted | Epstein | Redacted | Redacted

More like, Banker, Politician, Politician, Banker, Politician, Actor, Banker, Educator, Lobbyist,
Lobbyist, Actor, Secret Service Agent, Actor, Royal, Royal, FBI Agent, etc...

[neurosis]

I'd like to know who (adults) is in the "1000's of hours of video" they wont release.

[CNCAppsJames]

I'd like to know who (adults) is in the "1000's of hours of video" they wont release.

What a lot of people do not know about the laws governing "Child Porn" is that it is illegal for ANYONE to even "posess" it. Even a law enforcement officer transporting a laptop with suspected/known child porn on it is in technical violation of the law. There are a lot of rules governing the enforcement and prosecution of it. Who can see it, under what circumstances, etc...).

Teenagers sexting each other is a real problem these days. The images sent back and forth between "consenting" teens/children, ...which by law they are not even allowed to "consent" to as they are minors... 100% meets the legal definition of child pornography and is a crime to posess, transfer, VIEW, etc....

That said, if there are minors in the video, it would be a crime to release. Even if they blurred the images of the minors, it still meets the legal definition.

And they can't very well say so-and-so is in the video because they can't release the video evidence so the perp has a defamation lawsuit. It's a mess to say the least.

[Bucky Cornstarch]

Counselor Nutboy has spoken!

[neurosis]

That said, if there are minors in the video, it would be a crime to release. Even if they blurred the images of the minors, it still meets the legal definition.

And they can't very well say so-and-so is in the video because they can't release the video evidence so the perp has a defamation lawsuit. It's a mess to say the least.

They don't have to release the videos to release the names of the people in the videos.

[CNCAppsJames]

They don't have to release the videos to release the names of the people in the videos. 

You absolutely 100% positive about that? 

[neurosis]

You absolutely 100% positive about that?

Everything I've read says that they can release the names of anyone seen in the video's as long as they're not a victim or it's not an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Since when do they not release the names of pedophiles to the public?

[MIL-TFP-41]

So suppose Trump's name is mentioned alongside Clinton's on the files. Since Clinton is under investigation, those pages will be redacted, along with Trump's name.

I'm telling ya, rinse/repeat.

[Newbeeee™]

I'm telling ya, rinse/repeat.

This time it's gunna be different....

[CNCAppsJames]

Since when do they not release the names of pedophiles to the public?

Since when have they released the names of "uncharged" pedophiles is the correct question. 

I'm just playing devil's advocate. 

I personally think ANYONE connected to his trafficking, abuse, and exploitation of humans case needs to be outed.  But, there are legal ramifications to that if every t is not crossed and if every i is not dotted. And it'll be expensive because this will ruin people forever. You can rape someone and walk scott free. You can kill someone by driving drunk and it's no factor. You get the pedo/ChoMo tag and that's it, guilty or not. 

I'm just saying "caution" because it is entirely possible innocent people will get dragged into this. Maybe even the Door Dash person that delivered food. That's where this scanning electron microscope is going.

[TylerBeer]

I think given all of this, and the garbage Ukraine peace deal that's being floated... the Russian pee-tape of Herr Donald is absolutely %100 real.