Doomed to failure

Started by gcode, April 25, 2021, 10:21 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TylerBeer

#30
Quote from: mkd post_id=10514 time=1619971641 user_id=155Nuclear power plants that create radioactive waste needing to be stored for 20,000 years is about the worst idea mankind has EVER came up with.
 Change  my mind


There's a place called Bakersfield - you can just store it there and no-one will mind

mkd

#31
Quote from: CNCAppsJames post_id=10757 time=1620274012 user_id=62I LOATHE the CIA. They have gotten us into more trouble than all the other alphabet soups  [size=200]COMBINED[/size]!

[size=150]Yeah!
THEY LOST!!!!!!!!!
A
Freaking NUke!!!!!!!!!!!!
in
the FREAkinG
Himalayas.
[/size]


Remember the 80's spy spoof movie with chevy chase/ akroyd? 'Spies Like us"??? Truth is stranger than fiction.

CNCAppsJames

#32
#MakeFloggingGreatAgain
"That bill for your 80's experience...yeah, it's coming due. Soon." Author Unknown

Inventor Pro 2026 - CAD
CAMplete TruePath 2026 - CAV and Post Processing
Fusion360 and Mastercam 2026 - CAM

Surface

#33
Quote from: mkd post_id=10514 time=1619971641 user_id=155Nuclear power plants that create radioactive waste needing to be stored for 20,000 years is about the worst idea mankind has EVER came up with.
 Change  my mind


To answer, one must examine why the waste is being stored. As fuel for a reactor, the materials no longer produce sufficient energy to justify the cost of maintaining the facility needed to make electricity, however the waste is still producing radioactive energy, which is why the materials need to be stored for 20,000 years.

What if the energy emitting from the waste could be safely stored, yet also be used.

Technology is being developed to create a 'battery' which would last virtually forever. A radioactive core is protected by multiple layers of synthetic diamonds, one of the hardest materials to damage or break. The energy is absorbed in the diamond through inelastic scattering, which is used to generate electricity.

So now you have the best of both worlds. The nuclear waste is being safely stored i.e. encapsulated in diamonds, yet the energy can be used as an alternative source of energy.
"They talk of my drinking but never my thirst." — Scottish proverb

Matthew Hajicek

#34
Quote from: mkd post_id=10612 time=1620131803 user_id=155....And then there's always the CIA


They should have just had Bruce Willis do it.

Matthew Hajicek

#35
Quote from: Surface post_id=10815 time=1620400171 user_id=149To answer, one must examine why the waste is being stored. As fuel for a reactor, the materials no longer produce sufficient energy to justify the cost of maintaining the facility needed to make electricity, however the waste is still producing radioactive energy, which is why the materials need to be stored for 20,000 years.


It can be refined and concentrated, but that takes money.

mkd

#36
Quote from: Surface post_id=10815 time=1620400171 user_id=149
Quote from: mkd post_id=10514 time=1619971641 user_id=155Nuclear power plants that create radioactive waste needing to be stored for 20,000 years is about the worst idea mankind has EVER came up with.
 Change  my mind


To answer, one must examine why the waste is being stored. As fuel for a reactor, the materials no longer produce sufficient energy to justify the cost of maintaining the facility needed to make electricity, however the waste is still producing radioactive energy, which is why the materials need to be stored for 20,000 years.

What if the energy emitting from the waste could be safely stored, yet also be used.

Technology is being developed to create a 'battery' which would last virtually forever. A radioactive core is protected by multiple layers of synthetic diamonds, one of the hardest materials to damage or break. The energy is absorbed in the diamond through inelastic scattering, which is used to generate electricity.

So now you have the best of both worlds. The nuclear waste is being safely stored i.e. encapsulated in diamonds, yet the energy can be used as an alternative source of energy.


I remember something about that. Not aware of the diamond part. But they can burn up; hard aint everything.

pmartin

#37
[quote="Matthew Hajicek" post_id=10834 time=1620429958 user_id=57]
Quote from: Surface post_id=10815 time=1620400171 user_id=149To answer, one must examine why the waste is being stored. As fuel for a reactor, the materials no longer produce sufficient energy to justify the cost of maintaining the facility needed to make electricity, however the waste is still producing radioactive energy, which is why the materials need to be stored for 20,000 years.


It can be refined and concentrated, but that takes money.
[/quote]


Now that leads to a question. If urinite can be refined into uranium wouldn't it be even cheaper to re-refine spent fuel into usable fissile material?

RobertELee

#38
Slave labor? To make solar panels? You don't say.....

https://rumble.com/vgxqet-john-kerry-makes-jaw-dropping-confession-about-our-solar-panels-from-china.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab&fbclid=IwAR07Z7z-z-8S2agHqe8l8-oQwBtzXQvlq3BS04n7lpdbMPa8tkpWn5Aa3UE">https://rumble.com/vgxqet-john-kerry-ma ... kpWn5Aa3UE">https://rumble.com/vgxqet-john-kerry-makes-jaw-dropping-confession-about-our-solar-panels-from-china.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab&fbclid=IwAR07Z7z-z-8S2agHqe8l8-oQwBtzXQvlq3BS04n7lpdbMPa8tkpWn5Aa3UE