Nationalize Elections?

Started by jstell, February 03, 2026, 09:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jstell

I don't think so.  But at least we're starting to be honest that the goal is a one-party system.  Undivided, with corruption for all.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/02/politics/trump-calls-on-republicans-to-nationalize-future-elections

YoDoug

I don't think they need to be nationalized, Each state can administer their own elections. However I do think they could codify national law that makes them more secure.
"In all my years here and on the old forum I have heard, and likely said, some pretty unhinged stuff. But congrats, you're the new leader in clubhouse."  - ghuns, 6/06/2025

Bucky Cornstarch

As long as Trump can continue to convince the dim witted amongst us that elections are not secure, and that the only reason the right loses elections is because of fraud, this will continue to have traction.
Sad Sad x 1 View List

jstell

And five years after his own AG told him he was full of shit wishful thinking.
QuoteBarr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they've received, but "to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election."
https://apnews.com/article/barr-no-widespread-election-fraud-b1f1488796c9a98c4b1a9061a6c7f49d

Newbeeee™

Quote from: jstell on February 03, 2026, 09:44 AMUndivided, with corruption for all.
Corruption for all (of them) Fiss.
But remember when Schwab said this will be the last election.... :shrug:
TheeCircle™ (EuroPeon Division)
     :cheers:    :cheers:

mowens

Quote from: Newbeeee™ on February 03, 2026, 01:01 PMCorruption for all (of them) Fiss.
But remember when Schwab said this will be the last election.... :shrug:

I haven't heard that.
"I would gladly risk feeling bad at times if it also meant that I could taste my dessert." - Data

TylerBeer

Seems like some 2A warriors should be taking on the tyrannical government by now
Like Like x 1 View List

jstell

#7
Quote from: Newbeeee™ on February 03, 2026, 01:01 PMSchwab said this will be the last election
Quote from: mowens on February 03, 2026, 01:37 PMI haven't heard that.
I wasn't sure what he was referring to either.
This is the AI summary for a search (of the quoted phrase above) :
QuoteBased on available information, there is no evidence that Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum (WEF), has said that any recent or upcoming election (such as 2024 or 2025) will be the "last election."
Misinformation Context: Claims suggesting global leaders are declaring the end of democracy or elections are frequently spread as conspiracy theories online, often misrepresenting the goals of the WEF's "Great Reset" or "stakeholder capitalism" initiatives.
Search Results Analysis: Searches for quotes from Klaus Schwab regarding "last election" yield no credible results.

Newbeeee™

Quote from: jstell on February 03, 2026, 02:06 PMI wasn't sure what he was referring to either.
This is the AI summary for a search:
There was same interview he did where he said 2026 would also probably be the last UK election too - it was a couple of years ago - prolly halfway through the Buyed-In era when he was also banging on about more global ties with nations/countries etc. 
TheeCircle™ (EuroPeon Division)
     :cheers:    :cheers:

jstell

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-doubles-down-calls-gop-nationalize-voting-congressional-leaders-balk
Even Fox can't bring itself to get behind this dumb idea, simply reporting that the congressional leaders aren't on board.  The truly chilling thing is that he's quoted multiple times not just saying he wants to federalize elections, but that the republicans should take over elections.  One party, undivided, with corruption (and maybe gold statues) for all. :(

neurosis

Quote from: jstell on February 04, 2026, 11:05 AMOne party, undivided, with corruption (and maybe gold statues) for all.

I'd laugh my ass off if the Dems came out with their own version of project 2025 for a future presidency. I guess the SCOTUS would have to be on their side and as willing to accept bribes for left leaning policy as they are now for right. Something tells me a leftist president will be the end of the shadow docket and rubber-stamping an agenda for a period.
I'll go back to being a conservative, when conservatives go back to being conservative.

jstell

#11
Quote from: neurosis on February 04, 2026, 11:34 AMI'd laugh my ass off if the Dems came out with their own version of project 2025 for a future presidency.

First, round up all these MFers and ship them off to some banana republic they can pretend to run.  Maybe Little St. James.  Except the orange turd.  He needs a personalized set of golden handcuffs, and maybe a S/M dungeon ball-gag with matching gold lock.
Then, universal health care paid for by Bezos and Musk, just for fun.
Raise the minimum wage so that EIC and other benefits can be greatly reduced - right now this is just another corporate subsidy by the middle class.  The government making it so folks can live, while keeping corporate profits up for the investment class.
UBI for the AI job displacement that will become just another corporate subsidy without gov't action to keep folks from starving.
Let's see... am I forgetting anything?

edit:  Probably also have to make an executive order requiring Fucker Carlson to have his tongue pierced and then looped to a chain with the ends screwed to each of his big toenails.  I'm pretty sure that's fair.  At least he'll be earning his puppy-dog eyes.
Like Like x 2 View List

Rstewart

^^^^

Brother, does it not suck spending all day thinking about orange man?
Funny Funny x 3 View List

Newbeeee™

Quote from: jstell on February 04, 2026, 02:49 PMFirst, round up all these MFers
To be clear, you're talking all of them, both "sides"?
And their handlers? :shrug:
TheeCircle™ (EuroPeon Division)
     :cheers:    :cheers:

jstell

Quote from: Newbeeee™ on February 04, 2026, 10:29 PMTo be clear, you're talking all of them, both "sides"?
And their handlers? :shrug:
Well, everyone except for Bernie! 8)
Funny Funny x 1 View List