The greatest investor ever!

[neurosis]

Retail traders are mirroring investments by Nancy Pelosi's husband, whose stock picks have been strong performers over the last 2 years

https://beta.iris.finance/">https://beta.iris.finance/
Iris, a social investing app, tracks those trades. The app, which has more than 50,000 users according to its website, allows people to connect a brokerage account such as Robinhood to Iris to show what they're trading and see what others, such as celebrities and influencers, are trading themselves.
"Invest together with your family, friends, and brilliant people all over the world. Get real-time notifications when others make trades and copy their moves," the website says.
In Paul Pelosi's case, lawmakers are required to disclose their and their family's trading activity, allowing the general public too see his stocks.

Iris did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment, nor did a representative from Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's office. In a statement to Yahoo Finance, Speaker Pelosi's office said she doesn't own any stocks and has no prior knowledge in any transactions.

[BrianP.]

This is why I don't understand how anyone can trust any of our politicians. Term limits and make them subject to the same laws as the rest of us. Make it so they can't get any retirement benefits till they are at least 67. The most dangerous thing to the middle class is not corporations it's politicians.

[neurosis]

This is why I don't understand how anyone can trust any of our politicians. Term limits and make them subject to the same laws as the rest of us. Make it so they can't get any retirement benefits till they are at least 67. The most dangerous thing to the middle class is not corporations it's politicians.

Who was it that AOC was questioning about dark money and their influence over policy and he said, paraphrasing, "maybe you should be questioning the people who are accepting the money".  

[Tim Johnson]

This is why I don't understand how anyone can trust any of our politicians. Term limits and make them subject to the same laws as the rest of us. Make it so they can't get any retirement benefits till they are at least 67. The most dangerous thing to the middle class is not corporations it's politicians.

I'm pretty sure that would need to go through a Constitutional Amendment and getting 67% of congress or 67% of the States isn't going to happen at this point of time.

[Tim Johnson]

[quote="Tim Johnson" post_id=17097 time=1634141080 user_id=68]

This is why I don't understand how anyone can trust any of our politicians. Term limits and make them subject to the same laws as the rest of us. Make it so they can't get any retirement benefits till they are at least 67. The most dangerous thing to the middle class is not corporations it's politicians.

I'm pretty sure that would need to go through a Constitutional Amendment and getting 67% of congress or 67% (34) of the States isn't going to happen at this point of time.
[/quote]

[BrianP.]

Who was it that AOC was questioning about dark money and their influence over policy and he said, paraphrasing, "maybe you should be questioning the people who are accepting the money".  

She is the same idiot who said repealing the SALT cap helps only the rich. My wife and I combined take in about 2/3 of her pay. With income and property tax we go over the $10k limit by a couple a few thousand dollars. So clueless. Trump did the working middle class no favor when he put the cap in.

[BrianP.]

[quote="Tim Johnson" post_id=17097 time=1634141080 user_id=68]

I'm pretty sure that would need to go through a Constitutional Amendment and getting 67% of congress or 67% of the States isn't going to happen at this point of time.
[/quote]

We actually voted in term limits here in Massachusetts years ago. Politicians took it to their court appointed judges and got it thrown out.

[Tim Johnson]

[quote="Tim Johnson" post_id=17097 time=1634141080 user_id=68]

I'm pretty sure that would need to go through a Constitutional Amendment and getting 67% of congress or 67% of the States isn't going to happen at this point of time.

We actually voted in term limits here in Massachusetts years ago. Politicians took it to their court appointed judges and got it thrown out.
[/quote]

Was it State level or Federal? If I remember correctly (1992?) the Supreme Court threw out the Federal level for several States that voted for term limits but left the State level to the States. We currently have State level term limits in Michigan. The State of Washington voted for term limits that same year along with several States and also voted out the the Speaker of the House. He was the person that sued for the term limits to be removed.

[BrianP.]

[quote="Tim Johnson" post_id=17133 time=1634213511 user_id=68]

Was it State level or Federal? If I remember correctly (1992?) the Supreme Court threw out the Federal level for several States that voted for term limits but left the State level to the States. We currently have State level term limits in Michigan. The State of Washington voted for term limits that same year along with several States and also voted out the the Speaker of the House. He was the person that sued for the term limits to be removed.
[/quote]

State.

https://www.upi.com/Archives/1997/07/11/Mass-court-overturns-term-limits-law/9712868593600/">https://www.upi.com/Archives/1997/07/11 ... 868593600/">https://www.upi.com/Archives/1997/07/11/Mass-court-overturns-term-limits-law/9712868593600/

[Tim Johnson]

[quote="Tim Johnson" post_id=17133 time=1634213511 user_id=68]

Was it State level or Federal? If I remember correctly (1992?) the Supreme Court threw out the Federal level for several States that voted for term limits but left the State level to the States. We currently have State level term limits in Michigan. The State of Washington voted for term limits that same year along with several States and also voted out the the Speaker of the House. He was the person that sued for the term limits to be removed.

State.

https://www.upi.com/Archives/1997/07/11/Mass-court-overturns-term-limits-law/9712868593600/">https://www.upi.com/Archives/1997/07/11 ... 868593600/">https://www.upi.com/Archives/1997/07/11/Mass-court-overturns-term-limits-law/9712868593600/
[/quote]

So it was 1994 when the States voted term limits. Your State Supreme Judges overturned the law. While I read your link I came across an article that said early this year our State Supreme Judges declared our State term limit law legal. The media must have kept that news to themselves.

[Del.]

She is the perfect definition of Cunt.

[BrianP.]

She is the perfect definition of Cunt.

Can't
Understand
Normal
Thinking

Yup. That about sums it up.  

[pmartin]

She is the perfect definition of Cunt.

Can't
Understand
Normal
Thinking

Yup. That about sums it up.  

Thet thar is pretty funny.

[YoDoug]

I don't know if it is true but I saw a tweet today saying that Pfizer stock is the 5th highest, as in number of shares owned, by congress. I just don't know how we can trust them to make the right decisions when their wealth is connected to those decisions.