Andy McCarthy on the Durham report

Started by beej, November 09, 2021, 07:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

beej

Andy, (former US attorny for SDNY) has been dead on, in every turn of this ridiculous conspiracy, I'm betting he's right here as well.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/11/where-john-durhams-investigation-is-heading/">https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/11/ ... s-heading/">https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/11/where-john-durhams-investigation-is-heading/

QuoteDurham's indictment of Danchenko and his mid-September indictment of Democratic lawyer Michael Sussmann appear to confirm that he is building toward a final report, not wide-ranging criminal charges.

I am not saying there will be no more indictments. There could be. But if there are, they will likely be similar to the indictments of Sussmann and Danchenko — who, you no doubt noticed, were separately charged, and are not alleged to have conspired with each other or anyone else. Those indictments imply that Durham has uncovered a Clinton-campaign scheme to leverage the Obama/Biden administration's investigative powers against Clinton's political opponent, Trump. Yet, Durham has charged the two defendants only with lying to the FBI. And tellingly, he did not file charges against people with whom Danchenko and Sussmann collaborated in supplying specious information to investigators, much less accuse the investigators themselves of misconduct.


QuoteIt will make for an infuriating report. But not a criminal indictment.
Human pride weighed you down so heavily that only divine humility could raise you up again. ~Augustine of Hippo