Supreme Court

[Incogneeto]

Loves Trump.

This should shut up those pesky Judges.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/supreme-court-decisions-06-27-25

"Winning"    

[Incogneeto]

The Supreme Court decision will have sweeping implications, both in the near- and longer-term, with knock-down effects on the more than 300 federal lawsuits that have challenged White House actions since Trump's second presidency began on Jan. 20, 2025.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi praised the high court's ruling on social media Friday.

"Today, the Supreme Court instructed district courts to STOP the endless barrage of nationwide injunctions against President Trump," she said, adding that the ruling "would not have been possible without tireless work from our excellent lawyers" at the Justice Department and U.S. Solicitor General  John Sauer.

"This Department of Justice will continue to zealously defend @POTUS's policies and his authority to implement them," she added.

[gcode]

It's not a slam dunk
Judges can still issue injunctions, but they only apply to a particular case.
They can no longer issue nationwide blocks of Trump's EO's and the blocks they have issued
are null and void.
Let the winning begin   

[Jeff]

I prefer this headline. It's far more accurate than fakenewscnn's headline:

BREAKING: SCOTUS has ruled, and the RADICAL LEFT DISTRICT JUDGES are no longer able to enact nationwide injunctions!

[gcode]

from Incog's link on CNN

Inside the courtroom as the opinions were read
From CNN's Hannah Rabinowitz
Divisions between the justices were on full display as they read aloud some of the most controversial cases of the terms, particularly in the case involving birthright citizenship.

As Justice Sonia Sotomayor read her dissent from the bench, she pointedly called the opinion striking down the use of universal injunctions "shameful." As she read the line aloud, several members of the court who signed on to the majority opinion looked at her directly and then quickly looked away.

As Sotomayor read her dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito, a conservative member of the court, repeatedly raised his eyebrows and pursed his lips. In a few instances, most notably as Sotomayor warned that "no right is safe in the new legal regime the court creates," Alito appeared to roll his eyes, lean back in his chair and stare at the ceiling.

As Alito read aloud another opinion that backed a group of religious parents who want to opt their elementary school children out of engaging with LGBTQ books in the classroom, Justice Elena Kagan, a senior liberal judge on the high court, shook her head.

And when Sotomayor again read her dissent, Alito in turn appeared to chuckle as she questioned whether the ruling would undermine the country's public school system.

Justice Neil Gorsuch was not on the bench when the final opinions of the term were read aloud. The court did not immediately respond to an inquiry about his absence.

[Incogneeto]

I prefer this headline. It's far more accurate than fakenewscnn's headline:

I know, But if I had used Fox I could feel all the disgust and eyerolling.    

[CNCAppsJames]

The "nation-wide injunctions" were absurd.

I'm not a fan of rule by EO. I am however a fan of each branch of government fulfilling their obligations; executive branch "runs" the government, legislative branch writes the rules, and the judicial branch enforces the rules.

If we could do that it would be great.

What we have now; Executive Branch trying to run the government, legislative branch sitting in the corner weeping and soiling their pampers, judicial branch gnashing it's teeth because they can't legislate form the branch right now and they've become accustomed to doing it with no checks on them.

[Jeff]

I know, But if I had used Fox I could feel all the disgust and eyerolling.    

Fuck em.

[Incogneeto]

I can see all the judges now.

"Harumph"!!!

"Harumph"!!!

"Harumph"!!!

[gcode]

Justice Jackson beat down

[Incogneeto]

Justice Jackson beat down

It was worse than that.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/amy-coney-barrett-goes-right-at-the-jugular-of-biden-s-dei-scotus-justice/ar-AA1Hyjay?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=b6efa8950fc64e858557fd0e41c1069d&ei=53

[gcode]

Yup

After establishing the positive argument for the majority's decision, Barrett addresses Jackson's dissent.

"We will not dwell on [Jackson's] argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself," Barrett scathes. "We observe only this: [Jackson] decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."

Preach it, Sister!

[Jeff]

Justice Jackson beat down

The DEI appointee got a beatdown? Whoodathunkit?

[Incogneeto]

My Bet is she isn't even qualified enough to know she has been totally embarrassed.