Vaccine required for employment

Started by mowens, October 06, 2021, 12:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

thad

#60
Quote from: mowens post_id=17843 time=1635537327 user_id=74So now they are offering $100 to everyone who is fully vaccinated by December 8th.


They were doing similar payouts to get people vaxxed this past summer.
Using MC2023

Rstewart

#61
My job requires a secret clearance, but I've yet to hear much of anything from my direct employer stating if they're gonna fire the unvaccinated.  I already got the J&J but I haven't disclosed that.  There's a lotta folks attempting the religious exemption.  We'll see tho, I do stand with those refusing as I don't agree either.

Tim Johnson

#62
Quote from: Rstewart post_id=17848 time=1635567669 user_id=63My job requires a secret clearance, but I've yet to hear much of anything from my direct employer stating if they're gonna fire the unvaccinated.  I already got the J&J but I haven't disclosed that.  There's a lotta folks attempting the religious exemption.  We'll see tho, I do stand with those refusing as I don't agree either.


I think there's a lawsuit to shut down the mandate for the military and people employed by the military.
FJB

mowens

#63
My job requires clearances as well.
Defense contractors are not going to risk losing billions no matter how small that risk may be.
"I would gladly risk feeling bad at times if it also meant that I could taste my dessert." - Data

BrianP.

#64
Quote from: thad post_id=17847 time=1635556044 user_id=54
Quote from: mowens post_id=17843 time=1635537327 user_id=74So now they are offering $100 to everyone who is fully vaccinated by December 8th.


They were doing similar payouts to get people vaxxed this past summer.


My state did a vax lottery. 5 one million dollar prizes and 5 three hundred thousand dollar scholarship prizes for those under 18. Six and a half million dollars of tax payer money and it did nothing. The ways they waste our money astounds and infuriates me.

YoDoug

#65
MN has been really good at Covid data. They publish daily case counts here;

https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/situation.html#cases1">https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases ... tml#cases1">https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/situation.html#cases1

They publish weekly breakthrough case counts here;

https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/stats/vbt.html">https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases ... s/vbt.html">https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/stats/vbt.html

A little simple math comparing the two sets of info shows that over the last 6 weeks breakthrough case counts have gone from 20-25% to 50%+. The daily case count lags about a week so last weeks numbers are not solid yet, but if the trend continues it could as high as 75% of new cases are in fully vaxxed people. There has been a few media outlets tracking this data and publishing it. So what does MN do to keep the scam going, They somehow come up with a "re-infected" count that they say they previously hadn't reported and added it into the new case count this week. 8000+ cases just magically added in. This will skew the breakthrough % much lower sot hey can falsely claim the vax is still working.

Tim Johnson

#66
Today this company started the process of complying to the OSHA mandate just in case the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Federal injunction gets overturned. The weekly testing will be in-house and free. The masks weren't mentioned so I'm guessing we will have to provide them ourselves. This will only start after all the appeals have ended and the mandate stands but because of the massive fines the start up process needs to begin right away.
FJB

mkd

#67
The 2003 court case against defense secretary Rumsfeld makes it clear that all these mandates are 100% illegal.
google it

Tim Johnson

#68
Rumsfeld appears to have had many court cases. The Anthrax case was conducted by the United States District Court (District of Columbia). The current mandate injunction is from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in which I think the next step is the Supreme Court but I could be wrong.
FJB

mkd

#69
[quote="Tim Johnson" post_id=18544 time=1637185513 user_id=68]
Rumsfeld appears to have had many court cases. The Anthrax case was conducted by the United States District Court (District of Columbia). The current mandate injunction is from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in which I think the next step is the Supreme Court but I could be wrong.
[/quote]


well, there are two mandates. The one for government contractors (not the 100 employee) seem most analogous to the rumsfeld one that states the military can't force service members to submit to inoculations.
 at least that's my unprofessional hope/opinion

Rstewart

#70
Starting this coming Monday, if you're not vaxxed, you Will be wearing a mask 100% of the time.  Military installation.

Bullseye_Gotcha

#71
"Several months ago, our studies showed that natural infection induced a strong response, and this study now shows that the responses last," Weiskopf says. "We are hopeful that a similar pattern of responses lasting over time will also emerge for the vaccine-induced responses."

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting-immunity-found-after-recovery-covid-19">https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-res ... y-covid-19">https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting-immunity-found-after-recovery-covid-19

Seeing my wife and I had the virus I suspect our immunity is far greater than the "we are hopeful" vaccinated.

My place of employment (100+) has not stated anything about a mandate, but they ARE requiring everyone wear a mask again. Seeing we had the latest surge run rampant and taking a majority of the vaccinated out of commission.

Shazam/TPP

#72
Quote from: Bullseye_Gotcha post_id=18583 time=1637259227 user_id=214My place of employment (100+) has not stated anything about a mandate, but they ARE requiring everyone wear a mask again. Seeing we had the latest surge run rampant and taking a majority of the vaccinated out of commission.


and the problem is the vaccinated then blame the unvaccinated instead of realizing the "vaxx" isn't working like the "science" suggested it would..  imagine that science not being 100% correct  :whistle:  :coffee:
:sofa:  :cheers: