JD Vance takes Europe to the woodshed

[Del.]

They also never envisioned someone having a 30 round magazine in a semi auto rifle.

You're either consistent on this shit are you aren't. You can't just make it up as you go?

I doubt they thought muskets would be the weapon of future generations also.

[Del.]

They also never envisioned someone having a 30 round magazine in a semi auto rifle.

You're either consistent on this shit are you aren't. You can't just make it up as you go?

Consistency doesn't mean right.

[Incogneeto]

They also never envisioned someone having a 30 round magazine in a semi auto rifle.

You're either consistent on this shit are you aren't. You can't just make it up as you go?

They had the capacity to draft a constitution that has lasted over 200 years.

And yet YOU have an issue.??

[neurosis]

I doubt they thought muskets would be the weapon of future generations also.

I love how we all get to decide what they meant and how different people interpret it based on their own personal beliefs.

Consistency doesn't mean right.

Ok, if that's your position then don't complain about firearm regulation. 

Not you specifically, but our resident constitutionalists.

[neurosis]

They had the capacity to draft a constitution that has lasted over 200 years.

And yet YOU have an issue.??

reference the dumb ass comment above.

[neurosis]

Consistency doesn't mean right.

By the way, I agree with you.  lol It's the hypocrisy that bothers me.

[Incogneeto]

To quote smit  "are you having a dumb ass competition with someone"? 

To Quote Incog.

"You Won"

[CNCAppsJames]

Then change the amendment to reflect that. You're making up what you want it to mean.

No, I am positing the question; if they came here ILLEGALLY meaning they broke the law to come here are they really subject to the jurisdiction thereof?

I do not believe them to be subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

[Del.]

I love how we all get to decide what they meant and how different people interpret it based on their own personal beliefs.


Ok, if that's your position then don't complain about firearm regulation. 

Not you specifically, but our resident constitutionalists.

We all know that someday there will be sharks with frickin laser beams attached to their heads.

[CNCAppsJames]

They also never envisioned someone having a 30 round magazine in a semi auto rifle.

You're either consistent on this shit are you aren't. You can't just make it up as you go?

WRONG! Google "Puckle Gun"

WRONG! We The People owned WAR SHIPS, Cannons, and they had private armies FFS.

I told you son, you are WAY THE FUCK out of your league in this discussion. Not only from a law perspective but from a historical one too.

[Incogneeto]

We all know that someday there will be sharks with frickin laser beams attached to their heads.

"FISH WIN"!!  "FISH WIN"!!

[neurosis]

I do not believe them to be subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

All that means is that they are under the legal authority of a particular governing body. In this case, the US (or State) government?

[neurosis]

I told you son, you are WAY THE FUCK out of your league in this discussion. Not only from a law perspective but from a historical one too.

You're starting to lose me in an incog way. 

[CNCAppsJames]

I doubt they thought muskets would be the weapon of future generations also.

Check out "puckle gun".

They knew PLENTY about what was possible. 

[neurosis]

Check out "puckle gun".

They knew PLENTY about what was possible.

" It was never used during any combat operation or war. Production was highly limited and may have been as few as two guns"