There was no election fraud in 2020

[gcode]

by any reputable news services?

there are none

[mkd]

Soooooooo...."if" there was soooooo much election fraud, why hasn't it been found by any reputable news services?

As I recall, a certain newspaper did a deep dive into Florida a couple years after the 2000 election....their determination was Bush won, probably.

So where is, say Fox, Townhall or any one of a few others that people would "reasonably" expect to be legit, doing their look into the several states that people proclaim were "stolen"?

The Arizona look was done by a clown show.....so how about the rest?

Seems to me if it were as real as many have been claiming for 3 years now, that some news organization would drool over winning a Pulitzer....

 

great questions. It sure is convenient that we have an un-auditable election process.
Have you watched 2000 Mules?
H.R. 4310 into law in 2012 might also have something to do with media compliance and the fact that it's basically state owned media in this country.   

[CNCAppsJames]

Seems to me if it were as real as many have been claiming for 3 years now, that some news organization would drool over winning a Pulitzer....

 

They LOATHE #OrangeManBad WAY more than they love a Pulitzer.

[JParis]

They LOATHE #OrangeManBad WAY more than they love a Pulitzer.

So not a single reporter from a large National or a small regional wants to make a name for themselves....

If you believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale that you might be interested...I can let it go cheap 

[YoDoug]

there are none

GatewayPundit/RedState/PJmedia are all pretty good if you look past their exaggerations and sensationalism and find the part of the story that is the real details. They like to blow things out of proportion, but the underlying details are usually spot on. Their coverage of election fraud has been really good in that they point out all the inconsistencies and anomalies that suggest fraud happened, but then they claim it is absolute proof. 

[RobertELee]

there are none

If the legacy media is attacking them they are doing something right.

[neurosis]

GatewayPundit/RedState/PJmedia are all pretty good if you look past their exaggerations and sensationalism and find the part of the story that is the real details.

Their reporting is *very* one sided and they intentionally leave out key details that might otherwise change your opinion of what you're reading. They are all an awful source for information if you're actually trying to be informed and not just feeding your confirmation bias.

[YoDoug]

Their reporting is *very* one sided and they intentionally leave out key details that might otherwise change your opinion of what you're reading. They are all an awful source for information if you're actually trying to be informed and not just feeding your confirmation bias.

You just described the majority of left leaning sites as well. Everyday I see a new article from business insider with some "expert" claiming Trumps is done for. Then you read the article and see it is sensationalized opinion and none of it ever comes to fruition. 

As for confirmation bias, there is no media outlet that represents my beliefs. I'm a pro-life, vegan, climate concerned, pro 2a, fiscally conservative, socially liberal, Christian. And inside of each of those label there are points I subscribe to and points I don't. None of them have my fully unquestioning support.

[beej]

As for confirmation bias, there is no media outlet that represents my beliefs.

You probably feel the same, but I for one, don't even care if a media outlet represents my beliefs. I just wish I could find one that presents the facts that are true, no matter whether those facts agree with left or right bias. And right along with that, a media source should be willing to run a story that reflects positively or negatively on any candidate despite political leanings.

[Jeff]

So not a single reporter from a large National or a small regional wants to make a name for themselves....

That hasn't even crossed their minds because they are so brainwashed they can't even think of the possibility that the election was rigged.

It's like trying to convince a flat earther that the planet is round.

[Incogneeto]

Our Local news generally reports nothing.

Weather.

Upcoming events.

Sports.

Very General National News. Left.

They are usually 3 Days behind on any Real News.

Or Like So.


"Breaking News Man Shot"

A Man was shot!! no further details at this time.

We do have Evansville Watch which is up to the minute. and most often witness accounts.

[neurosis]

You just described the majority of left leaning sites as well.

Any source that you have to describe as "leaning" probably isn't a good place to get information.

Worse though, is when you can tell by the language (inflammatory) that they use that you're not going to get the full story but then choose to believe it anyway, even when you can find evidence that they're being misleading at best, just flat out lying at worst. Any time you can tell the bias of the source just by the way the article is written, it's not journalism, it just an editorial. 

As for confirmation bias, there is no media outlet that represents my beliefs

And they shouldn't be there to represent anyone's beliefs. They should just be telling us the facts as they know it at the time and let us develop an opinion based on the information given. 

BTW, I don't feel represented by most of the "leaning" media outlets either. Or *most* of our politicians for that matter.

[neurosis]

As for confirmation bias, there is no media outlet that represents my beliefs. I'm a pro-life, vegan, climate concerned, pro 2a, fiscally conservative, socially liberal, Christian. And inside of each of those label there are points I subscribe to and points I don't. None of them have my fully unquestioning support.

With the exception of Vegan and the fact that I'm not religious at all, that sounds about where I stand.  I'm a 2A supporter but not quite as "give me guns or give me death" as most of you. 

[Tim Johnson]

I know for a fact it changed the outcome of not only the POTUS vote in Michigan, but also the Senator race and S.O.S. race.
There was an (R) rep (military vet) that was leading (D) Gary Peters by a LOT (about 100k votes) before the "1:30am mystery" and just like the POTUS race and the S.O.S. he was way behind when the counting continued.

I read that Trump got 10% of the Michigan early morning voting dump. Michigan has a very close democrat majority so it's ridiculous to believe 90% of voters in any part of Michigan would vote Democrat. There's a reason the votes dumped in the middle of the night.