Alex Jones agrees to liquidate his assets to pay Sandy Hook families

Started by neurosis, June 08, 2024, 07:37 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7

mkd

#30
June 10, 2024, 07:44 AM
Quote from: neurosis on June 10, 2024, 07:41 AMI'm pro staying out of a womans business and not forcing them to carry nonviable pregnancies to term. If that's what you mean.

I'm not pro defamation and slander to the point that the families of murdered children are harassed for 10 years. Are you?
Baby killer
Bird Bird x 1 Funny Funny x 1 View List

neurosis

#31
June 10, 2024, 07:44 AM
Quote from: mowens on June 10, 2024, 07:36 AMReko, is that you?

I can't remember if Reko was a Jones fan?  I'm sure he'd be preaching the "pro free speech" angle but I don't think he'd be buying the supplements.  I feel like he deserves more credit than that? :lol: 

On a positive note, whoever donated to Jones or bought his supplements can feel good knowing that they contributed to the familes that Jones defamed all of these years. 
I'll go back to being a conservative, when conservatives go back to being conservative.

mkd

#32
June 10, 2024, 07:57 AM
Jones is allowed to spew conspiracy theories just as you are allowed to spew your affinity for dead human babies.
 Those two thingss are not equal, in the grand scheme.

neurosis

#33
June 10, 2024, 08:08 AM Last Edit: June 10, 2024, 08:13 AM by neurosis
Quote from: mkd on June 10, 2024, 07:57 AMJones is allowed to spew conspiracy theories just as you are allowed to spew your affinity for dead human babies.
 Those two thingss are not equal, in the grand scheme.

You hurt me deeply :lol:

Sure, he's allowed to spew conspiracy theories. What he's not allowed to do, is defame families to make a buck. Anyone on here who has been harassed by JB would probably agree with that?  No?   Alex sent his reporter down to harass the families (and more) and admitted that he was doing it for the $$$ .  The best part was when Alex purgered himself and his attorney accidentally sent the entire contents of his cell phone to the other attorney.  :lol:  If you watched any of the trial, like Trump, Alex doesn't know when to shut the hell up. Those two have very similar personalities. 
I'll go back to being a conservative, when conservatives go back to being conservative.

mkd

#34
June 10, 2024, 08:13 AM
There should be a court case and award of the same scale for PP selling human baby parts for profit.
This country has a massive morality problem
My daughter is even in the baby killing camp. It's freaking nuts.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

neurosis

#35
June 10, 2024, 08:22 AM
Quote from: mkd on June 10, 2024, 08:13 AMThere should be a court case and award of the same scale for PP selling human baby parts for profit.
This country has a massive morality problem
My daughter is even in the baby killing camp. It's freaking nuts.

I'm not sure where your daughter stands on abortion. I feel like the conversation is far more nuanced than "if you don't hold my exact opinion on abortion than you're a baby killer" and I wouldn't expect to have a constructive debate on the subject in a room full of Christians. 

I would agree with you on PP if that's really what's happening. I don't know anything about it other than I seem to remember some O'Keefe video years ago?
I'll go back to being a conservative, when conservatives go back to being conservative.

mkd

#36
June 10, 2024, 08:36 AM
Quote from: neurosis on June 10, 2024, 08:22 AMI'm not sure where your daughter stands on abortion. I feel like the conversation is far more nuanced than "if you don't hold my exact opinion on abortion than you're a baby killer" and I wouldn't expect to have a constructive debate on the subject in a room full of Christians. 

I would agree with you on PP if that's really what's happening. I don't know anything about it other than I seem to remember some O'Keefe video years ago?
The irony of arguing with her parent on the stupid clump of cells theory...was.... Well, stupid.
 Getting high and mighty virtue signalling about the theoretical butthurt of murdered school children's parent while standing on your soap box full of dead babies is rather ironic, to say the least.
 It's not a Christian thing for me it's a libertarian thing. As in defending the liberty of the innocent.
 Did you see the jail  sentencing of the 70 year old disabled women for praying outside of a clinic?
 This country is sick.

neurosis

#37
June 10, 2024, 08:54 AM
Quote from: mkd on June 10, 2024, 08:36 AMDid you see the jail  sentencing of the 70 year old disabled women for praying outside of a clinic?
 This country is sick.

No, but I would agree. If that's what happened then it's pretty disgusting.

Quote from: mkd on June 10, 2024, 08:36 AMThe irony of arguing with her parent on the stupid clump of cells theory...was.... Well, stupid.

Some people think that it's stupid to force a little girl who was raped by a relative to carry an incest baby to term is stupid. Yet you'll still get the same "baby killer" label, even if they want the pregnancy terminated in the first six weeks.

But what ever. I'm sure you've heard all of the arguments and still - "baby killer". 

Quote from: mkd on June 10, 2024, 08:36 AMGetting high and mighty virtue signalling about the theoretical butthurt of murdered school children's parent while standing on your soap box full of dead babies is rather ironic, to say the least.

Are you saying that the parent's of those kids were "theoretically butt hurt"? God damn that's harsh.

You do know that there are libertarians who see pro choice as the minimized role of the state in a woman's right to control her body and its functions? 



I'll go back to being a conservative, when conservatives go back to being conservative.

mkd

#38
June 10, 2024, 09:17 AM
Quote from: neurosis on June 10, 2024, 08:54 AMNo, but I would agree. If that's what happened then it's pretty disgusting.

Some people think that it's stupid to force a little girl who was raped by a relative to carry an incest baby to term is stupid. Yet you'll still get the same "baby killer" label, even if they want the pregnancy terminated in the first six weeks.

But what ever. I'm sure you've heard all of the arguments and still - "baby killer". 


Needing to invent the most extreme example means you've lost the argument and don't believe it yourself. Welcome to the moral-side.

mkd

#39
June 10, 2024, 09:20 AM
Quote from: neurosis on June 10, 2024, 08:54 AMYou do know that there are libertarians who see pro choice as the minimized role of the state in a woman's right to control her body and its functions? 




They should stick to smoking dope
Funny Funny x 2 View List

neurosis

#40
June 10, 2024, 09:36 AM
Quote from: mkd on June 10, 2024, 09:20 AMThey should stick to smoking dope

You're actually the minority in that respect.

Not the smoking dope part.  :lol:   
Funny Funny x 1 View List
I'll go back to being a conservative, when conservatives go back to being conservative.

neurosis

#41
June 10, 2024, 09:36 AM Last Edit: June 10, 2024, 09:41 AM by neurosis
Quote from: mkd on June 10, 2024, 09:17 AMNeeding to invent the most extreme example means you've lost the argument and don't believe it yourself. Welcome to the moral-side.

No, those are the examples that I would support. And I'm not inventing anything. It happens every day. Pregnancy by rape that is, not necessarily incest. I wouldn't want to force any rape victim to carry a pregnancy to term against her will. Just to be clear.
I'll go back to being a conservative, when conservatives go back to being conservative.

mkd

#42
June 10, 2024, 09:44 AM
Quote from: neurosis on June 10, 2024, 09:36 AMNo, those are the examples that I would support. And I'm not inventing anything. It happens every day. Pregnancy by rape that is, not necessarily incest. I wouldn't want to force any rape victim to carry a pregnancy to term against her will. Just to be clear.
. you're arguing the exceptions, not the rule (of racist eugenics form of population control) and basically agree with me.

neurosis

#43
June 10, 2024, 10:09 AM
Quote from: mkd on June 10, 2024, 09:44 AM. you're arguing the exceptions, not the rule (of racist eugenics form of population control) and basically agree with me.

Maybe, but those "exceptions", add up to 10's of thousands of pregnancies a year. And that's just the one exception (rape). Still enough to get you labeled a baby killer apparently.

Quote from: mkd on June 10, 2024, 09:44 AMracist eugenics form of population control

Is that still even a thing anymore?

--------

I feel like were taking away from my Alex Jones celebration by straying so far off topic.  :D 
I'll go back to being a conservative, when conservatives go back to being conservative.

RobertELee

#44
June 10, 2024, 10:47 AM
Quote from: neurosis on June 10, 2024, 07:41 AMI'm pro staying out of a womans business and not forcing them to carry nonviable pregnancies to term. If that's what you mean.

I'm pro the federal government staying the fuck out of my life. If that means them staying out of baby killing and leaving it up to the states then so be it. And that is EXACTLY what is going on. There is no federal baby killing law, it's 100% left up to the states.
Like Like x 1 View List
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7