Trump shot at rally

Started by RobertELee, July 13, 2024, 03:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RobertELee

Quote from: Del. on July 22, 2024, 09:02 AMAnyone else watching Congress question her?  She won't answer anything. Even democrats are frustrated with her. It's like having a dialogue with Smit. It goes nowhere.

Nancy Mace pounded her into the ground and shes not a bad looking congresswoman either.

Del.

Quote from: Smit on July 22, 2024, 09:15 AMI've watched some of it. She's basically a punching bag while both sides push their sides talking points into their "questions."

Lol. I've tried to have reasonable dialogue with unreasonable people many times. It goes nowhere. :)

Has there been questions by them that you thought were unfair?

Del.

This Director has not even been to the site of assassination attempt   

Del.

One congressman told her she should go back to guarding Doritos.
Funny Funny x 2 View List

Smit

Quote from: Del. on July 22, 2024, 09:36 AMHas there been questions by them that you thought were unfair?

I wouldn't say unfair. I think some of them were kind of pointless unless the point was to beat Cheatle up further. 90% of those questions could be answered by saying "We fucked up."

The slope of the roof being a safety risk for security was a really stupid thing to say. He hammered her hard for that, rightfully so.
Thank  You Thank You x 1 View List

RobertELee

Quote from: Del. on July 22, 2024, 10:03 AMOne congressman told her she should go back to guarding Doritos.

I LOL'ed when I heard that.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Jeff

Nancy Mace calling her out on her bullshit.  :wub:




Like Like x 1 View List

Del.

Quote from: Smit on July 22, 2024, 10:04 AMI wouldn't say unfair. I think some of them were kind of pointless unless the point was to beat Cheatle up further. 90% of those questions could be answered by saying "We fucked up."

The slope of the roof being a safety risk for security was a really stupid thing to say. He hammered her hard for that, rightfully so.

I think they were wanting to know specifics which she kept deferring to an investigation taking up to 60 days. She should be able to answer questions she knew were coming. Acccording to her the shooter wasn't deemed a threat until he fired the first shot even though they knew he was on the roof with a gun.

RobertELee

Cheatle is a "DEI horror story"  :rofl:
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Smit

Quote from: Del. on July 22, 2024, 10:17 AMAcccording to her the shooter wasn't deemed a threat until he fired the first shot even though they knew he was on the roof with a gun.

I didn't hear that. It's pretty crazy to think they might have known he was on the roof with a gun and not consider him a threat.  :headscratch:

ghuns

Quote from: Smit on July 22, 2024, 10:26 AMI didn't hear that. It's pretty crazy to think they might have known he was on the roof with a gun and not consider him a threat.  :headscratch:

Or that they didn't delay Trump going on stage until they put boots on that dangerously sloped roof to verify the threat.
Funny Funny x 3 View List

Del.

Quote from: Smit on July 22, 2024, 10:26 AMI didn't hear that. It's pretty crazy to think they might have known he was on the roof with a gun and not consider him a threat.  :headscratch:

Yeah she said he was considered suspicious and then couldn't answer if he was approached . She wouldn't even answer timelines events prior to shooting and kept referring to FBI investigation. One thing I think she united both Dems and republicans with frustration.

Smit

Quote from: ghuns on July 22, 2024, 10:31 AMOr that they didn't delay Trump going on stage until they put boots on that dangerously sloped roof to verify the threat.

If it is true they knew there was a guy was on a roof in the prone position with a gun (or even if there was just a guy on the roof at all) and they didn't view him as enough of a threat to delay Trump going on stage until they put boots on that dangerously sloped roof to verify he was not a threat it would certainly invite many questions that would be extraordinary difficult to explain.

So was it a series of inexplicable fuck ups or a conspiracy?

If a conspiracy, which side perpetrated the conspiracy with the SS?  :headscratch:

The anti trumpers or the pro trumpers? :)
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Smit

Quote from: Newbeeeeâ„¢ on July 22, 2024, 11:02 AMWhat about all the vid evidence showing what happened

I don't watch your stupid ass videos Frenchy.  :lol:

If you weren't clear on that, well, let me make it clear now. :lol:
Funny Funny x 1 Crazy Crazy x 1 View List

CNCAppsJames

Many are claiming "Cheatle doesn't have any 'Law Enforcement' experience. That is simply not true. She began work in the Secret Service in 1995-ish and served there until 2018 give or take a couple years. That's a LOT of time. Was it quality time? We'd have to see the personnel records.

Look, her ACTUAL failures continue to mount as more details on her management of the Secret Service come to light. There is no need to state untrue things in order to DQ her from serving as Director.
1) Her management IS complete and total shit based on the number of high profile failures that have surfaced during her tenure not even including the attempt on Trump''s life.
2) Her testimony in front of the congressional committee shows us she's not fit to hold the office of Director.
3) The ONLY reason she attained that position is because
a. she is a she (i.e she checks boxes)
b. Jilly and her were BFF's during the Obama Adminstration
Like Like x 1 View List
"That bill for your 80's experience...yeah, it's coming due. Soon." Author Unknown

Inventor Pro 2026 - CAD
CAMplete TruePath 2026 - CAV and Post Processing
Fusion360 and Mastercam 2026 - CAM