RFK hearing

[beej]

I'm just wondering who types questions in to an Ai search engine that include "um"s and apologizes for and then corrects spelling?  "And if histine, sorry, histidine"

It's kind of cute that you think people "type" in questions to AI. how old are you?

[Newbeeee™]

Strawman for what?

I don't know if this is supposed to be a justification for RFK misrepresenting and lying about studies he cites?

Not a defence of anything. But the whole fkin caboodle, is corrupt AF.
If you can't see it is all a game, I just don't know.

We're supposed to have Epstein files released, VaxxxxSeeeen transparency, DODGY exposure and savings blarrrr, blarrrr, blarrrr.
What we now have, is RFK's watch passing more and more new jabs, Elon going to launch a "new people's party" and the release.....oh wait for it, this is good.... the release, of Trump's fragrance line.
Yes, I do realise that was at the end of last year, but what we have, is no transparency, but the stench of perfume!

Seriously, surely, EVERYONE, can see we've all been had?

[neurosis]

.I raise you with a reminder of Richard Horton's statement in the Lancet 10 years ago, stating that perhaps half of all studies, are, simply, wrong....

Horton wasn't saying that all studies are untrustworthy? He was saying that there are a lot of studies that are done poorly.  Small sample sizes leading to unreliable results, poor methodology, and yes, conflicts of interest. These things are often reviewed and pointed out by other scientists. And sure, not all. You'll have to explain your point on that better.

If you look at one of the studies used by RFK in his letter to Congress, it had been flagged by the Journal Editor as using poor methodology AND being a conflict of interest and yet RFK still used it. 

Seriously, surely, EVERYONE, can see we've all been had?

No argument there.    The reasons I have may be different than yours.

[Newbeeee™]

Horton wasn't saying that all studies are untrustworthy? He was saying that there are a lot of studies that are done poorly.  Small sample sizes leading to unreliable results, poor methodology, and yes, conflicts of interest. These things are often reviewed and pointed out by other scientists. And sure, not all. You'll have to explain your point on that better.

You missed out the bit where he mentioned unrepeatable....due to small batch sizes.
ie, they test it once and get it to work = 100% success. yada yada.
Lies, damn lies, and statistics....
Yes he was at the time. Obviously by now, he may have had to tone it down and backtrack a little....

[neurosis]

I'm holding out for a Carnival position.

You might want to get in there and tell them that you don't want a Federal ban on THC.  You might have to donate to the Trump Coin. Nothing wrong with that, right? 

[Del.]

You might want to get in there and tell them that you don't want a Federal ban on THC.  You might have to donate to the Trump Coin. Nothing wrong with that, right? 

I grow my own and don't know damn thing about Trump coin.

[Incogneeto]

I grow my own and don't know damn thing about Trump coin.

Are you a certified Whoreticulturist??

[beej]

The move comes after RFK Jr. called top medical journals "corrupt."

he is not the only one.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2001145/

note the 2007 date on this.

[Newbeeee™]

Dang beej.
A N O T H E R  $£i€n£€  dee, nier!

[Incogneeto]

he is not the only one.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2001145/

note the 2007 date on this.

"You're as Bad as Incog"

[beej]

"You're as Bad as Incog"

I take that as a great compliment!

[neurosis]

he is not the only one.

Did he call the medical journals corrupt and then go on to misrepresent several studies, flat out make things up that weren't even in the studies, and cite studies that have been marked as being untrustworthy while using that misinformation to convince Congress to make changes to medical recommendations for the Country you live in?

See the difference?

[Newbeeee™]

Fukkinhell Dave - Have you got shares in pHarma?

[Newbeeee™]

25 years ago, UK parliament speech.
Wise words
https://x.com/JamesMelville/status/1940384068098773267

[neurosis]

Fukkinhell Dave - Have you got shares in pHarma?

I wish. 

I'm trying to see if after people find out what a lying trash bag RFK is (and always has been), they will still defend and support him.

We're kinda seeing how that plays out are we not?

By the way, calling RFK out for what he's doing doesn't = fan of big pharma. I don't think that is a tough concept to grasp?