Grand Jury Russia Probe.

[Incogneeto]

Wasn't it Clinton (Hilliary) who called Tulsi a Russian Asset??

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/justice-department-announces-grand-jury-in-russia-hoax-probe/vi-AA1JTyKc?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=c79b35ae6f1543258962322dc383a43d&ei=16

[CNCAppsJames]

It was. For that hideous harpy to call an active duty member of the military ... without a shred of proof... a "russian asset"... that was just messed up. Then to call her friends a Google to cut off Tulsi's fund-raising website for a period of time that sealed the fate of her run and showed the American People what the Demonrat Party is all about.

[beej]

Is the grand jury proceeding in DC? If so, it's pretty much DOA, isn't it?

[YoDoug]

Is the grand jury proceeding in DC? If so, it's pretty much DOA, isn't it?

I read it is in FL.

[CNCAppsJames]

Hopefully Killary doesn't know the identities of the Grand Jurors.

There might be a rash of suicides, car crashes, and boating accidents if she does. 

 

[gcode]

Pam Bondi is empaneling a grand jury in Florida

[YoDoug]

IMO, grand jury's are total BS. No judge and no defense give corrupt prosecutors free reign to tamper with potential jury pools by the way of implied guilt by grand jury indictment. It is totally used and abused when they don't want a judge to throw their case out of court. Also used to swing public sentiment by the same reasoning.

That being said I'm sure Clinton, Et Al are all guilty, and I get the need to want to have a supposed impartial grand jury bringing the indictment, however the grand jury process lacks credibility in moderns times because of the rampant abuse.

[mkd]

IMO, grand jury's are total BS. No judge and no defense give corrupt prosecutors free reign to tamper with potential jury pools by the way of implied guilt by grand jury indictment. It is totally used and abused when they don't want a judge to throw their case out of court. Also used to swing public sentiment by the same reasoning.

That being said I'm sure Clinton, Et Al are all guilty, and I get the need to want to have a supposed impartial grand jury bringing the indictment, however the grand jury process lacks credibility in moderns times because of the rampant abuse.

Still a decent alternative to a bought off or scared judge

[Jeff]

The House has subpoena'd all of those fucks.

https://oversight.house.gov/release/chairman-comer-subpoenas-bill-and-hillary-clinton-former-u-s-attorneys-general-and-fbi-directors-and-records-related-to-jeffrey-epstein

[JParis]

No one really expects anything to come of this, do they?

[YoDoug]

No one really expects anything to come of this, do they?

Nope, and even if it did end in convictions, people are so partisan it wouldn't change anyone's mind. It would only cement their beliefs even further.

[Jeff]

No one really expects anything to come of this, do they?

I do.
There will be blood.

[Incogneeto]

I do.
There will be blood.

All you had to do was Show Megyn and Del's on board.

[Jeff]

Weird that Peter Strzok's entire Twitter history has been scrubbed.
even from the "wayback machine".

[beej]

I would settle for an Alford plea