Paul Pelosi's DUI

[Jim at Gentex]

How about you go do your research....

         

Breath

         

YOU FUNNY!!

         

[Smit]

Rage bait still works.

Don't be a Jeff. 

[neurosis]

By "Jesse Watters angle" you mean the truth, right?

I can't tell.  Most 'after the fact' articles I've read include the injuries, dui (including a drug), vehicle damage, charges, etc.  So I don't know if he's injecting some hyperbole about the injury? 

The injury to the guy in the Jeep was reported to be minor and not until the day after the crash.  I don't want to dedicate a full day to a 2 year old dui case so I don't know how injured the guy really was. Does anyone even have the guys real name?  Can we check to see if the injuries were really that serious? It's obvious that Dr Jesse Watters thinks so? Did the guy find out who Pelosi was and grab his neck "I'm going to die!"?  Inquiring minds want to know. The severity of the injury is the only thing that would justify harsher charges from what I can tell as an amateur attorney.   

The donor card was covered by almost every article I read. That's pretty cheesy. Right along the lines of a Reese Witherspoon saying "Do you know who I am!?!"

[beej]

Rage bait still works.

Don't be a Jeff. 

do you think you need to vote for Harris to save democracy?

[Bucky Cornstarch]

It's not like they get their news from any of the MSM sites when there are place like Gateway Pundit and Redstate (and FOX) to feed them their rage bait (thanks Smit), but it's always fun when Nutcons complain about the MSM and then claim that FOX isn't part of the MSM.

Nielsen released the full list of cable news viewership for the third quarter of 2024 this week. Here are the top 25 rated shows from 07/01/24-09/27/24:

1. The Five, Fox News: 3.46 million
2. Jesse Watters Primetime, Fox News: 3.45 million
3. Hannity, Fox News: 3.23 million
4. Gutfeld, Fox News: 2.77 million
5. The Ingraham Angle, Fox News: 2.69 million
6. Special Report, Fox News: 2.50 million
7. Outnumbered, Fox News: 1.89 million
8. The Story, Fox News: 1.9 million
9. America Reports, Fox News: 1.84 million
10. Faulkner Focus, Fox News: 1.81 million
11. Your World with Neil Cavuto, Fox News: 1.80 million
12. America's Newsroom, Fox News: 1.78 million
13. Deadline (5-6 pm), MSNBC: 1.63 million
14. Reidout, MSNBC: 1.62 million
15. The Beat, MSNBC: 1.60 million
16. MSNBC 9 pm (Rachel Maddow/Alex Wagner average): 1.58 million
17. Last Word, MSNBC: 1.58 million
18. MSNBC 8 pm (Chris Hayes/Jen Psaki average): 1.56 million
19. Fox News at Night, Fox News: 1.54 million
20. Deadline (4-4 pm), MSNBC: 1.52 million
21. Fox and Friends, Fox News: 1.21 million
22. Morning Joe, MSNBC: 1.14 million
23. 11th Hour, MSNBC: 974,00
24. Anderson Cooper 360, CNN: 916,000
25. Katy Tur Reports, MSNBC: 911,000

[Smit]

do you think you need to vote for Harris to save democracy?

Do you think Trump and his sycophants did/would/will lie about election fraud and stolen elections in an attempt to maintain power?

Do you think Trump and his sycophants did/would/will try to subvert the peaceful transition of power in an attempt to maintain power?

[gcode]

It's not like they get their news from any of the MSM sites when there are place like Gateway Pundit and Redstate (and FOX) to feed them their rage bait (thanks Smit), but it's always fun when Nutcons complain about the MSM and then claim that FOX isn't part of the MSM.

I don't watch any of those shows

[Jim at Gentex]

It's not the ratings, it's the content that separates Fox from the MSM.

ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, etc., are too busy trying to sell the Harris / Walz ticket to the American public to be bothered to cover a story like the Paul Pelosi DUI case.

Let's try to imagine for a minute that a similar DUI case would involve the spouse of the current Speaker of the House, rather than the former Speaker.

YOU ALL KNOW FULL WELL that the vast majority of the MSM (above) would crucify the current Speaker 24/7 with every possible salacious detail they could dig up, and then some.

I'm not raging, just pointing out the obvious double standard AGAIN, to those who are either blind or willfully ignorant of it. 

[beej]

Do you think Trump and his sycophants did/would/will lie about election fraud and stolen elections in an attempt to maintain power?

Do you think Trump and his sycophants did/would/will try to subvert the peaceful transition of power in an attempt to maintain power?

I'll answer your questions, even though you didn't answer mine. But I see the rage bait works well for the left too.

1) Since 2016 all we have heard from both sides of the aisle is that there was election fraud. for 2024, the term maintain power is wrong because he is not in power. right now he is trusting the secret service (who is currently controlled by the people he is running against) to protect him from being shot. that is the opposite of power.

2)I think that there will be ridiculous protests after this election no matter who wins. in 2016 protestors took to the streets and tore up cities after Trump won. then in 2020 protestors went to the capital and tore up stuff there after Biden won. I expect similar protests this year. but through all of that all of the ex presidents left the white house peacefully and transition teams, worked together for the peaceful transition of power, even if they did so begrudgingly.

[Jeff]

Let's try to imagine for a minute that a similar DUI case would involve the spouse of the current Speaker of the House, rather than the former Speaker.

YOU ALL KNOW FULL WELL that the vast majority of the MSM (above) would crucify the current Speaker 24/7 with every possible salacious detail they could dig up, and then some.

In before they answer with the "they're corrupt on both sides" deflection.

[Jeff]

Since 2016 all we have heard from both sides of the aisle is that there was election fraud

It goes back further than that.
Remember Al Gore wanting recount after recount? And the left screaming that the election was stolen from them because the outcome didn't go in their favor?

[Jim at Gentex]

In before they answer with the "they're corrupt on both sides" deflection.

Yep...but we have already established that.

My point remains that anyone who thinks the media coverage would be equal for both cases is either blind or willfully ignorant. 

Also, when Hillary claimed the election was stolen from her, the MSM all nodded in agreement.

[Smit]

But I see the rage bait works well for the left too.

Yeah I knew where you were going with that.

[Smit]

Yep...but we have already established that.

My point remains that anyone who thinks the media coverage would be equal for both cases is either blind or willfully ignorant. 

Are we still talking Fox news here? If so, I'd tend to agree.

[Jim at Gentex]

Are we still talking Fox news here? If so, I'd tend to agree.

We are talking about the fact that Fox News is separate from the MSM since they are the ONLY major media outlet that is questioning the obvious preferential treatment Paul Pelosi is receiving.

The rest of the media is ignoring that and focused on influencing the election for Harris / Walz.