World Economic Forum Speeches

[Newbeeee™]

Wah. All you got is name calling. Wah. 

and low bills....

[neurosis]

Remember when incog called me names every day and nobody cared?   

[Smit]

Remember when incog called me names every day and nobody cared?   

Vaguely. We got over it pretty quickly. 

[neurosis]

Vaguely. We got over it pretty quickly. 

I was just making an observation on how selective people are at noticing the name calling.   

It has calmed down a lot sorta. If we could get bucky to mellow the fuck out anyway.

[Newbeeee™]

Remember when incog called me names every day and nobody cared?   

TrumpTard

[neurosis]

TrumpTard

We can re-roll tape?  See who called names first and more often?

If I call you a fuck face and you retaliate, I can't very well hold that against you, can I?

edit: I had to look it up.. I don't think I've called anyone a trumptard?

[Smit]

You must be kind of new around here... 

[neurosis]

You must be kind of new around here... 

This is why I like beej so much. He can be condescending without resorting to personal insults. 

[Newbeeee™]

edit: I had to look it up.. I don't think I've called anyone a trumptard?

No.
I called you one

[neurosis]

No.
I called you one

Well I probably am one.

[Smit]

This is why I like beej so much. He can be condescending without resorting to personal insults. 

Beej isn't one to call names much, but man, the contortions he went through to justify being a Republican were painful to watch.

I mean, ouch man! 

[neurosis]

Beef isn't one to call names much, but man, the contortions he went through to justify being a Republican were painful to watch.

I mean, ouch man! 

Beej has the gold metal in mental gymnastics for sure. Especially more recently. I still like going back and forth with him.

When we were debating the issue of priests turning over child abusers who admit it during confession - how do you turn that in to a moral debate and lean on the side of not turning over the child abuser based on morals?  I don't know how you can make that argument    That was some kung-fu logic.

[jstell]

Beej has the gold metal in mental gymnastics for sure. Especially more recently. I still like going back and forth with him.

When we were debating the issue of priests turning over child abusers who admit it during confession - how do you turn that in to a moral debate and lean on the side of not turning over the child abuser based on morals?  I don't know how you can make that argument    That was some kung-fu logic.

Sacrament of confession and all that.
I just have a hard time accepting moral authority from dudes in dresses who like to fuck little boys.

[neurosis]

Sacrament of confession and all that.
I just have a hard time accepting moral authority from dude's in dresses who like to fuck little boys.

If you know someone is abusing a child, and you allow it to happen, you have no morals. The child diddling priests is part of that equation. Could you knowingly allow someone to abuse a child and justify it by claiming sacrament of confession?

Could you make an argument justifying it?

[jstell]

Absolutely not!