Parler is Gone...

Started by Reko, January 11, 2021, 03:48 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Go Down Pages 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12

gcode

#135
January 12, 2021, 12:14 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
QuoteGcode, serious question: why don't you guys accept Bill Barr's assessment of the election??? He was a faithful conservative throughout his tenure as AG. He had the FBI look into election fraud and came away with the same answer as the courts: NO MASS ELECTION FRAUD.


Between the IRS/Tea Party investigation, the Clinton emails server investigation, the Russian Collusion investigation, the bogus FISA warrants,  and the illegal surveillance  of the Trump campaign, the FBI has less than zero credibility.
They are liars and partisan hacks with badges.

Sharles

#136
January 12, 2021, 12:25 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
I'm starting to feel like I'm in a dystopian Twilight episode where everyone refuses to agree to ANY ground rules for dialogue/debate...WTH? :sofa:

gcode

#137
January 12, 2021, 12:29 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: Sharles post_id=3187 time=1610483131 user_id=104I'm starting to feel like I'm in a dystopian Twilight episode where everyone refuses to agree to ANY ground rules for dialogue/debate...WTH? :sofa:


you can't debate with unprincipled liars..

by that I mean The Swamp, not my fleeMC friends

Del.

#138
January 12, 2021, 12:30 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
All anyone wanted was the courts to look at any evidence, if it actually existed and make the evidence public. Instead the courts refused and that is as much of cause of riots as Trumps mouth.

I can't say election was stolen but it damn sure was setup for him to lose with massive mail in votes and unheard of amounts of money donated to Dems, and not to mention the media bias and all out attacks on Trump from day 1.

Any other candidate would have lost in a landslide.

Ron

#139
January 12, 2021, 12:32 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: Sharles post_id=3187 time=1610483131 user_id=104I'm starting to feel like I'm in a dystopian Twilight episode where everyone refuses to agree to ANY ground rules for dialogue/debate...WTH? :sofa:


Ground Rule #1: Agree with me or it's bullshit?

Del.

#140
January 12, 2021, 12:38 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
And even now with Trump beaten and legacy lost and a new administration starting, The Dems want to impeach him with one week left instead of focusing on Biden's agenda and then even trying to take his Secret Service protection away.  Be very careful what you Dems do.  74 million people won't like it one bit and the Capital raid could end up looking like a tea party.

mowens

#141
January 12, 2021, 12:52 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
Yeah, I thought it was supposed to be fun over here. Do you guys enjoy insulting each other, saying "fuck you" to each other?

What exactly is the point of this thread?
"I would gladly risk feeling bad at times if it also meant that I could taste my dessert." - Data

Bucky Cornstarch

#142
January 12, 2021, 01:06 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: Del. post_id=3191 time=1610483893 user_id=113And even now with Trump beaten and legacy lost and a new administration starting, The Dems want to impeach him with one week left instead of focusing on Biden's agenda and then even trying to take his Secret Service protection away.  Be very careful what you Dems do.  74 million people won't like it one bit and the Capital raid could end up looking like a tea party.


I agree that Pelosi needs to check her ego. Trump's legacy as the worst president in American history will remain intact with or without a second impeachment.  The last thing we need right now are more dead people.

Matthew Hajicek

#143
January 12, 2021, 01:08 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: Del. post_id=3189 time=1610483406 user_id=113All anyone wanted was the courts to look at any evidence,


That's not how courts work.  You don't show up and say "Look at my evidence, then figure out what to do."  You start with allegations, then the court decides if those are valid, and then you get to present evidence.  It doesn't matter how much evidence you have if you have no standing (for example Texas alleging that other state's didn't run their elections properly).  Look up what allegations were filed, and what the court's responses were.

https://www.texastribune.org/2020/12/11/texas-lawsuit-supreme-court-election-results/">https://www.texastribune.org/2020/12/11 ... n-results/">https://www.texastribune.org/2020/12/11/texas-lawsuit-supreme-court-election-results/

Here's Johnny!

#144
January 12, 2021, 01:09 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: Sharles post_id=3183 time=1610481742 user_id=104
Quote from: JFord post_id=3182 time=1610481616 user_id=140Just like the FBI investigating the Clinton email servers...

Why? Does it only count if you get the outcome you want? That's not justice. I'm tired of both sides making the DOJ their pawn for partisan retribution, sigh.. :spank:


And the entire Seth Ritchie investigation....

Matthew Hajicek

#145
January 12, 2021, 01:10 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: Ron post_id=3190 time=1610483565 user_id=94Ground Rule #1: Agree with me or it's bullshit?


Yep, that's the right's position.

Smit

#146
January 12, 2021, 01:12 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: mowens post_id=3192 time=1610484763 user_id=74saying "fuck you" to each other?


I gotta admit that did make me laugh.  :lol:

Quote from: Sharles post_id=3187 time=1610483131 user_id=104I'm starting to feel like I'm in a dystopian Twilight episode where everyone refuses to agree to ANY ground rules for dialogue/debate...WTH? :sofa:


Remember this one Sharles?

">

Ron

#147
January 12, 2021, 01:20 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
[quote="Matthew Hajicek" post_id=3197 time=1610485821 user_id=57]
Quote from: Ron post_id=3190 time=1610483565 user_id=94Ground Rule #1: Agree with me or it's bullshit?


Yep, that's the right's position.
[/quote]

Seems to be everyone's position these days

RobertELee

#148
January 12, 2021, 01:34 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: Ron post_id=3200 time=1610486448 user_id=94[quote="Matthew Hajicek" post_id=3197 time=1610485821 user_id=57]
Quote from: Ron post_id=3190 time=1610483565 user_id=94Ground Rule #1: Agree with me or it's bullshit?



Yep, that's the right's position.


Seems to be everyone's position these days
[/quote]

No, this is everyone's position now days....

https://i.ibb.co/GJ68jPt/132756804-1161807964289149-6006011116259640259-n.jpg">

Zoober

#149
January 12, 2021, 03:17 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: gcode post_id=3184 time=1610481873 user_id=60
Quote from: Smit post_id=3179 time=1610481104 user_id=66When Trumps lawyers went into court instead of presenting evidence they started blathering conspiracy theories and got their asses kicked out and ridiculed.

Time after time after time. :rolleyes:


Trumps lawyers showed up in Nevada with 40, 000 pages of evidence of dead voters, out of state voters
illegal alien voters, double voters, felon voters etc etc etc..
They had a PO box in Vegas with over 200 absentee voters living in it.
All of this was gleaned from public records.
The judge showed up with a prewritten denial.. The court hearing lasted 40 minutes.


But that's not really MASS voter fraud. Or WIDESPREAD fraud.
C'mon, man!
Go Up Pages 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12