The Debate

[neurosis]

That wasn't a lie.

She co-sponsored the original bill and voted against protections for babies born alive after failed abortions.

Can you name a single State that it's legal to kill a baby after birth?

And I'm not talking about a baby that already isn't going to live or is suffering.

[gcode]

Killing babies after birth,

this is not a lie.... the left will deny it till hell freezes over but it happens all the time.
to prevent the killing of a baby "after" death, they cut the baby into pieces in the womb at the time of birth.

[Jeff]

Can you name a single State that it's legal to kill a baby after birth?

Do you know the difference between a bill and a law?

[Smit]

Can you name a single State that it's legal to kill a baby after birth?

Oh great now the fact checkers have come here! 

[Bucky Cornstarch]

You're absolutely right but not because of why you think. The people that support him starting speaking the truth. The D's didn't like that.
So they used a very left leaning Snopes as their source. Even though it was a husband and wife team, every libtard used their word as gospel.

So the reason we have fact checkers now is because the left doesn't like to hear the truth.

No, it is because Trump is a fucking liar.

eww, Wiki!

Probably worse than that is the number of people who believe him.

[Smit]

Well that's why we can't have reasonable political conversations on this forum. 

Probably worse than that is the number of people who believe him.

It's incredible watching people contort reality to make it seem like he is not lying. 

[RobertELee]

If that's true, that's fucked up.

I heard they were sorority sisters. Not sure how to check that to be sure however.

[Jeff]

And I'm not talking about a baby that already isn't going to live or is suffering.

Why not? Because that would defeat your argument?

[Jeff]

Not sure how to check that to be sure however

Ask Dumbsmit. He's the moral compass on what is egregious and what isn't.

[neurosis]

Why not? Because that would defeat your argument?

No, because those babies are already going to die.  In those cases, what are they supposed to do? 

I'm still not sure it's legal to euthanize them?  Is it?

[Bucky Cornstarch]

Deflect! Typical.

I figured since this thread has devolved into one about lies I figured I'd repeat one that gets bandied about ad nauseum by Trumptards world wide.

[Del.]

I think he said a former governor of West Virginia

Actually it was former governor of Virginia. He spoke on what happens when a baby is born in the third trimester and something is wrong with the baby.


Go to 38 minute mark

[Jeff]

No, because those babies are already going to die.  In those cases, what are they supposed to do? 

I'm still not sure it's legal to euthanize them?  Is it?

You do what every medical professional says they would do since the dawn of time. Vow to try and save their lives.
In other words, do no harm.

Do you place such little value on human life that you even have to ask that question?

[mowens]

A moderator's job should be to make sure the candidates adhere to the rules. it is the job of the listener to decide who is telling the truth. When the moderator starts interjecting themselves into the debate by "fact checking" they are telling the public "we think you're too stupid to sniff out bullshit". By picking and choosing what to fact check, they are imposing their own beliefs and opinions and it is no longer a debate. It is a 3 on 1 argument.

[mowens]

Well that's why we can't have reasonable political conversations on this forum. 

It's incredible watching people contort reality to make it seem like their candidate is not lying. 

Both candidates are unscrupulous liars.